Raines v. Spearman et al

Filing 6

ORDER OF SERVICE. Habeas Answer or Dispositive Motion due by 8/31/2016.. Signed by Judge William Alsup on 5/31/16. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(dl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/31/2016)

1
2
3
4
5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8
9

CHRISTOPHER RAINES,
Plaintiff,

ORDER OF SERVICE

v.

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12

No. C 16-1974 WHA (PR)

J. FREGOS; M.E. SPEARMAN,
Defendants.

13

/
14
INTRODUCTION

15

Plaintiff, a California prisoner at the California Training Facility (“CTF”) in Soledad,

16
17

California, filed this civil rights case under 42 U.S.C. 1983 against two CTF officials. He is

18

granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis in a separate order. For the reasons discussed

19

below, the complaint is ordered served upon defendants.
ANALYSIS

20
21

A.

STANDARD OF REVIEW

22

Federal courts must engage in a preliminary screening of cases in which prisoners seek

23

redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C.

24

1915A(a). In its review the court must identify any cognizable claims, and dismiss any claims

25

which are frivolous, malicious, fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or seek

26

monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. Id. at 1915A(b)(1),(2). Pro

27

se pleadings must be liberally construed. Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Dep't, 901 F.2d 696, 699

28

(9th Cir. 1990).

1

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a)(2) requires only "a short and plain statement of the

statement need only '"give the defendant fair notice of what the . . . . claim is and the grounds

4

upon which it rests."'" Erickson v. Pardus, 127 S. Ct. 2197, 2200 (2007) (citations omitted).

5

Although in order to state a claim a complaint “does not need detailed factual allegations, . . . a

6

plaintiff's obligation to provide the 'grounds of his 'entitle[ment] to relief' requires more than

7

labels and conclusions, and a formulaic recitation of the elements of a cause of action will not

8

do. . . . Factual allegations must be enough to raise a right to relief above the speculative

9

level." Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 127 S. Ct. 1955, 1964-65 (2007) (citations omitted). A

10

complaint must proffer "enough facts to state a claim for relief that is plausible on its face." Id.

11
For the Northern District of California

claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief." "Specific facts are not necessary; the

3

United States District Court

2

at 1974.

12

To state a claim under 42 U.S.C. 1983, a plaintiff must allege two essential elements:

13

(1) that a right secured by the Constitution or laws of the United States was violated, and (2)

14

that the alleged deprivation was committed by a person acting under the color of state law.

15

West v. Atkins, 487 U.S. 42, 48 (1988).

16

B.

17

LEGAL CLAIMS
Plaintiff alleges that he is a Wiccan, a religion that requires a vegetarian diet. He claims

18

that defendants caused a substantial delay in his receiving vegetarian meals. When liberally

19

construed, plaintiff’s allegations state a cognizable claim for the violation of his rights under the

20

Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act, the First Amendment, and the Eighth

21

Amendment.

22

CONCLUSION

23

For the reasons set out above, it is hereby ordered as follows:

24

1. The clerk shall issue summons and the United States Marshal shall serve, without

25

prepayment of fees, a copy of the complaint with all attachments thereto, and a copy of this

26

order upon defendants Warden M.E. Spearman and J. Fregos at the California Training

27

Facility in Soledad, California. A courtesy copy of the complaint with attachments and this

28
2

1
2
3
4
5

order shall also be mailed to the California Attorney General’s Office.
2. Defendants shall file an answer in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure.
3. In order to expedite the resolution of this case:
a. No later than 91 days from the date this order is filed, defendants shall file a

6

motion for summary judgment or other dispositive motion. If defendants are of the opinion that

7

this case cannot be resolved by summary judgment, he shall so inform the court prior to the date

8

the summary judgment motion is due. All papers filed with the court shall be promptly served

9

on the plaintiff.
b. Plaintiff's opposition to the dispositive motion, if any, shall be filed with the

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

court and served upon defendant no later than 28 days from the date of service of the motion.

12

Plaintiff must read the attached page headed “NOTICE -- WARNING,” which is provided to

13

him pursuant to Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952, 953-954 (9th Cir. 1998) (en banc), and

14

Klingele v. Eikenberry, 849 F.2d 409, 411-12 (9th Cir. 1988).

15
16
17
18
19

c. Defendants shall file a reply brief no later than 14 days after the date of
service of the opposition.
d. The motion shall be deemed submitted as of the date the reply brief is due.
No hearing will be held on the motion unless the court so orders at a later date.
e. Along with his motion, defendants shall file proof that they served plaintiff

20

the Rand warning at the same time they served him with their motion. Failure to do so will

21

result in the summary dismissal of their motion.

22

4. All communications by the plaintiff with the court must be served on defendant, or

23

defendant’s counsel once counsel has been designated, by mailing a true copy of the document

24

to defendant or defendant’s counsel.

25

5. Discovery may be taken in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

26

No further court order under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(a)(2) or Local Rule 16-1 is

27

required before the parties may conduct discovery.

28
3

1

6. It is the plaintiff's responsibility to prosecute this case. Plaintiff must keep the court

2

informed of any change of address and must comply with the court's orders in a timely fashion.

3

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of this action for failure to prosecute pursuant to

4

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

5

IT IS SO ORDERED.

6
Dated: May
7

31

, 2016.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

8
9

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4

1
2

NOTICE -- WARNING (SUMMARY JUDGMENT)
If defendants move for summary judgment, they are seeking to have your case

3

dismissed. A motion for summary judgment under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil

4

Procedure will, if granted, end your case.

5

Rule 56 tells you what you must do in order to oppose a motion for summary judgment.

fact--that is, if there is no real dispute about any fact that would affect the result of your case,

8

the party who asked for summary judgment is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, which

9

will end your case. When a party you are suing makes a motion for summary judgment that is

10

properly supported by declarations (or other sworn testimony), you cannot simply rely on what

11
For the Northern District of California

Generally, summary judgment must be granted when there is no genuine issue of material

7

United States District Court

6

your complaint says. Instead, you must set out specific facts in declarations, depositions,

12

answers to interrogatories, or authenticated documents, as provided in [current Rule 56(c)], that

13

contradict the facts shown in the defendant's declarations and documents and show that there is

14

a genuine issue of material fact for trial. If you do not submit your own evidence in opposition,

15

summary judgment, if appropriate, may be entered against you. If summary judgment is

16

granted, your case will be dismissed and there will be no trial.

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
5