Crisafi FLP v. Ramirez
Filing
13
ORDER ADOPTING 10 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND REMANDING CASE TO STATE COURT. This case is REMANDED to Alameda County Superior Court for lack of jurisdiction. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 10/13/2016. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/13/2016) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/13/2016: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (jmdS, COURT STAFF).
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
CRISAFI FLP,
Plaintiff,
8
9
10
v.
MARIA RAMIREZ,
Defendant.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
Case No. 16-cv-05221-WHO
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION AND
REMANDING CASE TO STATE
COURT
Re: Dkt. No. 10
On September 21, 2016, Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore granted defendant’s
12
13
application to proceed in forma pauperis and issued a Report and Recommendation,
14
recommending that this unlawful detainer case be remanded to Alameda County Superior Court
15
for lack of jurisdiction. Dkt. No. 10.
16
Objections to Judge Westmore’s recommendation were due by October 11, 2016. Federal
17
Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b); Civ. Local Rule 72-3. As of today’s date, no objections have been
18
filed.
19
Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation, as well as the record in this case, I
20
ADOPT Judge Westmore’s Report and Recommendation in full. This case is REMANDED to
21
Alameda County Superior Court for lack of jurisdiction.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 13, 2016
______________________________________
WILLIAM H. ORRICK
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?