Crisafi FLP v. Ramirez

Filing 13

ORDER ADOPTING 10 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND REMANDING CASE TO STATE COURT. This case is REMANDED to Alameda County Superior Court for lack of jurisdiction. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 10/13/2016. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/13/2016) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/13/2016: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (jmdS, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 CRISAFI FLP, Plaintiff, 8 9 10 v. MARIA RAMIREZ, Defendant. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 Case No. 16-cv-05221-WHO ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND REMANDING CASE TO STATE COURT Re: Dkt. No. 10 On September 21, 2016, Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore granted defendant’s 12 13 application to proceed in forma pauperis and issued a Report and Recommendation, 14 recommending that this unlawful detainer case be remanded to Alameda County Superior Court 15 for lack of jurisdiction. Dkt. No. 10. 16 Objections to Judge Westmore’s recommendation were due by October 11, 2016. Federal 17 Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b); Civ. Local Rule 72-3. As of today’s date, no objections have been 18 filed. 19 Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation, as well as the record in this case, I 20 ADOPT Judge Westmore’s Report and Recommendation in full. This case is REMANDED to 21 Alameda County Superior Court for lack of jurisdiction. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 13, 2016 ______________________________________ WILLIAM H. ORRICK United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?