Briggs v. Freitas et al
Filing
8
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James, on 2/22/2017. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(rmm2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/22/2017)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
JACK F. BRIGGS,
Plaintiff,
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
Case No. 16-cv-06608-MEJ (PR)
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
v.
STEVE FREITAS, et al.,
Defendants.
12
13
On November 15, 2016, plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights complaint pursuant
14
to 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983. On January 10, 2017, the Court dismissed the complaint with leave to
15
amend, explaining the deficiencies in the complaint that needed to be cured. The Court directed
16
plaintiff to file an amended complaint within thirty days. Plaintiff was cautioned that his failure to
17
do so would result in the dismissal of this action. More than thirty days have passed, and plaintiff
18
has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise communicated with the Court.
19
20
21
22
Accordingly, the instant action is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk shall enter
judgment and close the file.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 22, 2017
23
24
25
26
27
28
MARIA-ELENA JAMES
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?