Briggs v. Freitas et al

Filing 8

ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James, on 2/22/2017. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(rmm2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/22/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 JACK F. BRIGGS, Plaintiff, 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 Case No. 16-cv-06608-MEJ (PR) ORDER OF DISMISSAL v. STEVE FREITAS, et al., Defendants. 12 13 On November 15, 2016, plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights complaint pursuant 14 to 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983. On January 10, 2017, the Court dismissed the complaint with leave to 15 amend, explaining the deficiencies in the complaint that needed to be cured. The Court directed 16 plaintiff to file an amended complaint within thirty days. Plaintiff was cautioned that his failure to 17 do so would result in the dismissal of this action. More than thirty days have passed, and plaintiff 18 has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise communicated with the Court. 19 20 21 22 Accordingly, the instant action is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk shall enter judgment and close the file. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 22, 2017 23 24 25 26 27 28 MARIA-ELENA JAMES United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?