Briggs v. Freitas et al

Filing 8

ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James, on 2/22/2017. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(rmm2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/22/2017)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

JACK F. BRIGGS,
Plaintiff,

8
9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

Case No. 16-cv-06608-MEJ (PR)
ORDER OF DISMISSAL

v.
STEVE FREITAS, et al.,
Defendants.

12
13

On November 15, 2016, plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights complaint pursuant

14

to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 10, 2017, the Court dismissed the complaint with leave to

15

amend, explaining the deficiencies in the complaint that needed to be cured. The Court directed

16

plaintiff to file an amended complaint within thirty days. Plaintiff was cautioned that his failure to

17

do so would result in the dismissal of this action. More than thirty days have passed, and plaintiff

18

has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise communicated with the Court.

19
20
21
22

Accordingly, the instant action is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk shall enter
judgment and close the file.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 22, 2017

23
24
25
26
27
28

MARIA-ELENA JAMES
United States Magistrate Judge