O'Keefe v. Tesla Motors et al
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - Response to Motion to Dismiss due by 4/17/2017. Hearing reset for 5/3/2017. If plaintiff fails to respond by the deadline, this action will be dismissed for failure to prosecute pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 04/03/2017. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/3/2017)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Case No. 3:16-cv-07179-WHO
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
Re: Dkt. No. 14
TESLA MOTORS, et al.,
On February 22, 2017, defendants Tesla Motors, Inc. and West Valley Staffing Group
moved to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint for failure to comply with pleading standards set forth in
Northern District Local Rules, FRCP 8 and FRCP 12. Mot. at 1 (Dkt. No. 14). The case was
reassigned to me on March 3, 2017, and the hearing on defendants’ motion was reset for April 12,
2017. Dkt. No. 25. Plaintiff has yet to respond to the motion. On March 30, 2017, plaintiff filed
a notice of address change and new phone number stating that he was homeless for several weeks.
Dkt. No. 28. He is ordered to respond to defendants’ motion by April 17, 2017, and the hearing is
reset for May 3, 2017. If plaintiff fails to respond by the deadline, this action will be dismissed for
failure to prosecute pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 3, 2017
William H. Orrick
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?