Six4three, LLC v. Facebook, Inc.

Filing 1

NOTICE OF REMOVAL (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0971-11098204) from San Mateo Superior Court. Their case number is CIV 533328. (). Filed byFacebook, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Civil Cover Sheet, #7 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Miller, Laura) (Filed on 1/24/2017)

Download PDF
                                                            EXHIBIT E From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Sonal Mehta Friday, January 20, 2017 5:15 PM David Godkin; James Kruzer; bpf@criterionlaw.com SERVICE-SIX4THREE Six4Three, LLC v. Facebook, Inc., Case No. CIV533328 Counsel,    We have reviewed Plaintiff Six4Three LLC’s January 12, 2017 Response To Defendant Facebook Inc.'s Specially Prepared  Interrogatories (Set Two) seeking the basis for Six4Three’s contentions with respect to the predicates for Section  17200.  In its responses, Six4Three identifies a variety of state and federal laws that it contends that Facebook has  violated, a number of which are facially inapplicable and for which we do not believe Six4Three could even assert a claim  in good faith.  Before we take action with the court, we ask that Six4Three review its contentions with respect to the  underlying state and federal laws referenced in these interrogatory responses and let us know by 5 pm ET on Monday  which of the predicate laws listed in the interrogatory responses Six4Three intends to pursue as a basis for its  unlawfulness claim. If we do not hear from you by then, we will understand that Six4Three maintains its contentions  that Facebook has violated the all of the laws identified therein and plans to assert those laws as a basis for its  unlawfulness claim in the case going forward, including to oppose summary judgment and thereafter, and we will  proceed accordingly.    Best,  Sonal N. Mehta | Durie Tangri LLP | smehta@durietangri.com | (415) 376-6427     1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?