Krzysztof Wolinski v. M. Colvin et al

Filing 14

ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINES 13 . (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 5/11/2017) (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/11/2017: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (tfS, COURT STAFF).

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

KRZYSZTOF WOLINSKI,
Plaintiff,

8

ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINES

9

v.

10

M. COLVIN, et al.,

11
United States District Court
Northern District of California

Case No. 17-cv-00583-SI

Re: Dkt. No. 13
Defendants.

12
13

Plaintiff’s second request for an extension of the deadline to file his planned motion to

14

remand this action to state court is GRANTED. Docket No. 13. Plaintiff must file and serve on

15

defense counsel any motion to remand the action to the state court no later than June 2, 2017. If

16

plaintiff files a motion to remand the action, defendants must file and serve their opposition no

17

later than June 30, 2017. If defendants file an opposition to his motion to remand, plaintiff must

18

file and serve his reply in support of his motion to remand no later than July 14, 2017.

19

For the reasons explained in the March 22, 2017 scheduling order, the deadline for plaintiff

20

to file a motion to remand will not be further extended. Plaintiff appears very interested in

21

pursuing his claims in state court rather than federal court. Plaintiff is informed that one way to do

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

so is to dismiss all his federal claims. Thus, even if he cannot prepare a motion to remand by the
deadline, plaintiff could obtain a return to state court by filing a one-page document stating that he
dismisses all his federal claims.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 11, 2017
______________________________________
SUSAN ILLSTON
United States District Judge