, LLC v. Colossus Con et al

Filing 49

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 47 re. Joint Notice of Settlement and Stipulation to Vacate and Continue Upcoming Hearings filed by, LLC. Case Management Statement due by 10/19/2017. Further Case Management Conference reset for 10/26/2017 10:30 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco. 8/17/17 Motion vacated. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 8/8/17. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/8/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 KRONENBERGER ROSENFELD, LLP Karl S. Kronenberger (Bar No. 226112) Jeffrey M. Rosenfeld (Bar No. 222187) Liana W. Chen (Bar No. 296965) 150 Post Street, Suite 520 San Francisco, CA 94108 Telephone: (415) 955-1155 Facsimile: (415) 955-1158 Attorneys for Plaintiff, LLC dba Colossalcon 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 14 15 NOSTALGIACONVENTIONS.COM, LLC, an Ohio limited liability company dba COLOSSALCON, 16 Plaintiff, 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 v. Case No. 3:17-cv-00695-EMC JOINT NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT AND STIPULATION TO VACATE AND CONTINUE UPCOMING HEARINGS; AND [PROPOSED] ORDER COLOSSUS CON aka COLOSSUS POP CULTURE EXPO & COMIC CON aka COLOSSUS POP EXPO, a business entity of unknown formation; MARINA LUKYANTSEVA aka MARINA LUKYANTSEVA-HAWORTH, an individual dba COLOSSUS CON; DAVIDSON HAWORTH, an individual dba COLOSSUS CON; COLOSSUS GIRL ENTERTAINMENT LLC, a California limited liability company; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, 25 26 Defendants. 27 28 Case No. 3:17-cv-00695-EMC JT. NTC. OF SETTLEMENT AND STIP. TO VACATE/CONTINUE; AND [PROP.] ORDER 1 The parties, Plaintiff, LLC dba Colossalcon (“Plaintiff”), 2 through counsel, and Defendants Marina Lukyantseva and Davidson Haworth 3 (“Defendants”), hereby notify the Court that they have reached a settlement in principle. 4 The parties’ settlement contemplates injunctive relief to be completed by October 1, 2017, 5 and, if said injunctive relief is completed, the parties intend to thereafter stipulate to 6 dismissal of the action with prejudice. 7 Therefore, to preserve the resources of the parties and the Court, the parties 8 hereby stipulate and request that the Court: (1) vacate the upcoming hearing on 9 Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, currently scheduled for August 17, 2017, and (2) continue 10 the upcoming status hearing, currently scheduled for September 14, 2017, to October 26, 11 2017, or any convenient date thereafter. 12 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 13 14 Dated: August 7, 2017 15 By: s/ Liana W. Chen______ Liana W. Chen Attorneys for Plaintiff 16 17 Dated: August 7, 2017 18 DAVIDSON HAWORTH By: s/ Davidson Haworth____ Defendant Pro Per 19 20 KRONENBERGER ROSENFELD, LLP Dated: August 7, 2017 MARINA LUKYANTSEVA By: s/ Marina Lukyantseva___ Defendant Pro Per 21 22 23 24 25 26 ATTESTATION OF CONCURRENCE IN FILING Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), the filer hereby attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other signatories, which shall serve in lieu of their signatures on the document. s/ Liana W. Chen____ Liana W. Chen 27 28 Case No. 3:17-cv-00695-EMC 1 JT. NTC. OF SETTLEMENT AND STIP. TO VACATE/CONTINUE; AND [PROP.] ORDER 1 6 7 8 VACATED. 2. The September 14, 2017 status hearing is HEREBY CONTINUED to October 26, 2017 [or ________________________ ] at 10:30 a.m. IT IS SO ORDERED. S 8/8/2017 Dated: ____________ UNIT ED 10 RT U O 9 S DISTRICT TE C TA D RDERE S SO O IED JUDGE UNITED T I I STATES DISTRICT DIF AS MO 11 12 en d M. Ch e Edwar Judg NO 13 RT ER H 14 15 R NIA 5 1. The August 17, 2017 hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is HEREBY FO 4 appearing, hereby orders: LI 3 The Court, having considered the parties’ stipulation and finding good cause A 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER N F D IS T IC T O R C 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 3:17-cv-00695-EMC 2 JT. NTC. OF SETTLEMENT AND STIP. TO VACATE/CONTINUE; AND [PROP.] ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?