Cavness v. Blum et al

Filing 7

ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 5/9/2017. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(lsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/9/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 12 13 14 DONALD EUGENE CAVNESS, P38865, ) ) ) No. C 17-0811 CRB (PR) Plaintiff(s), ) ) ORDER OF DISMISSAL vs. ) ) H. L. BLUM, et al., ) ) Defendant(s). ) 15 16 Plaintiff, a prisoner at San Quentin State Prison, has filed a pro se 17 complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 seeking $100,000,000 from California 18 Department of Public Health Registrar H. L. Blum and former United States 19 Secretary of the Treasury Jacob Lew. But the complaint is incomprehensible; at 20 best, it appears that plaintiff takes issue with his birth certificate because it 21 somehow associates him, an “American National of the Moorish Nation,” with a 22 “‘Public Office’ in the United States Treasury Department of Health Vital 23 Records, Internal Revenue Service and U.S. Department of Commerce by virtue 24 of Certificate of Live Birth, State of California Certification of Vital Record.” 25 Compl. (ECF No. 1) at 4. 26 Plaintiff’s incomprehensible complaint is DISMISSED as frivolous under 27 the authority of 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) because it is without an arguable basis in 28 law. See Jackson v. Arizona, 885 F.2d 639, 641 (9th Cir. 1989). There is no 1 indication whatsoever that a right secured by the Constitution or laws of the 2 United States was violated by a person acting under the color of state law. See 3 West v. Atkins, 487 U.S. 42, 48 (1988). 4 The clerk shall terminate all pending motions as moot and close the file. 5 SO ORDERED. 6 DATED: May 9, 2017 7 CHARLES R. BREYER United States District Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 G:\PRO-SE\CRB\CR.17\Cavness, D.17-0811.dismissal.wpd 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?