Waymo LLC v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
Filing
1
COMPLAINT for Violation of Defense of Trade Secret Act; Demand for Jury Trial against Otto Trucking LLC, Ottomotto LLC, Uber Technologies, Inc. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, receipt number 0971-11180330.). Filed by Waymo LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Verhoeven, Charles) (Filed on 2/23/2017) Modified on 2/28/2017 (gbaS, COURT STAFF).
Case 3:17-cv-00939 Document 1-3 Filed 02/23/17 Page 1 of 14
EXHIBIT C
Case 3:17-cv-00939 Document 1-3 Filed 02/23/17 Page 2 of 14
US009086273B1
(12) United States Patent
Gruver et al.
(10) Patent No.:
US 9,086,273 B1
(45) Date of Patent:
(54) MICROROD COMPRESSION OF LASER
º}. º
7,701,558 B2
(71) Applicant: Google Inc., Mountain View, CA (US)
-
e
-
(72) Inventors: Daniel Gruver, San Francisco, CA
(US); Pierre-Yves Droz. Mountain
View, CA (US); Gaetan Pennecot, San
; i.
4/2010 Walsh et al.
52- . ~ *
7,255,275 B2
7,688,348 B2
BEAM IN COMBINATION WITH TRANSMIT
LENS
Jul. 21, 2015
7,710,545 B2
7,969,558 B2
2005/0237519 A1 *
egnan
8/2007 Gurevich et al.
3/2010 Lubard et al.
5/2010 Cramblitt et al.
6/2011 Hall
10/2005 Bondurant et al. ........ 356/241.1
2007/02684.74 A1 :}; 1 1/2007 Omura et al. ------------------- 355/67
2008/0100820 A1* 5/2008 Sesko .........
. . 356/4.01
2009/0059183 A1* 3/2009 Tejima ............................ 353/69
Francisco, CA (US); Zachary Morriss,
2009/01472.39 A1
San Francisco,s CA (US);s Dorel Ionut
!º. A1 3: Ha
2011/0216304 A
9/2011 ºsal ºr 356/338
Iordache, Walnut Creek, CA (US)
(73) Assignee: Google Inc., Mountain View, CA (US)
(*) Notice:
Subj ect to any º the º:
º º: e 20. adjusted under
-- - *--> -
y
ays.
2011/0255070 A1* 10/2011 Phillips et al. ............... 356/4.01
2013/0114077 A1*
5/2013 Zhang ........................... 356/328
OTHER PUBLICATIONS
OSRAM Opto Semiconductors GmbH, Datasheet for SPL DL90 3
Nanostack Pulsed Laser Diode, Mar. 24, 2009.
* cited by examiner
(21) Appl. No.: 13/790,251
(22) Filed:
6/2009 Zhu et al.
y
Primary Examiner – Isam Alsomiri
Assistant Examiner – Samantha KAbraham
Mar. 8, 2013
(51) Int. Cl
(74) Attorney, Agent, or Firm — McDonnell Boehnen
Goic 30s
G0IC 3/02
(52) U.S. Cl
(2006.01)
(
2006.01
)
Hulbert & Berghoff LLP
(57)
ABSTRACT
Crºº. Goic 3/02 (2013.01)
A LIDAR device may transmit light pulses originating from
CPC
G01S 17/10: G01S 7/497: G01S 17/89:
pulses that are detected by one or more detectors. The LIDAR
Gois 7487. Goid 308
device may include a lens that both (i) collimates the light
(58) Field of Classification Search
- --- - -- --
USPC ......... 356,301,401,407, soilhistory.
sojo,62s
S
lication file f
let
h
one or more light sources and may receive reflected light
º the one or º lightsourcesto º ºeV1Ce
light
Or TrainSIII.1SS1011 1DIO all enviro?lineIII OT IIle
ee application IIIe Ior complete searcn n1story
and (ii) focuses the reflected light onto the one or more detec
References Cited
tors. Each light source may include a respective laser diode
and cylindrical lens. The laser diode may emit an uncolli
mated laserbeam that diverges more in a first direction than in
a second direction. The cylindrical lens may pre-collimate the
uncollimated laser beam in the first direction to provide a
partially collimated laser that diverges more in the second
(56)
|U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
3,790,277 A
4,700,301 A
2/1974 Hogan
10/1987 Dyke
4,709,195 A
4,801.201 A
5,202,742 A
11/1987 Hellekson et al.
1/1989 Eichweber
4/1993 Frank et al.
6,108,094 A *
8/2000 Tani et al. ..................... 356/417
direction than in the first direction.
20 Claims, 6 Drawing Sheets
100
Case 3:17-cv-00939 Document 1-3 Filed 02/23/17 Page 3 of 14
U.S. Patent
Jul. 21, 2015
Sheet 1 of 6
US 9,086,273 B1
VI.6?un 1-I
Case 3:17-cv-00939 Document 1-3 Filed 02/23/17 Page 4 of 14
U.S. Patent
US 9,086,273 B1
Case 3:17-cv-00939 Document 1-3 Filed 02/23/17 Page 5 of 14
U.S. Patent
Jul. 21, 2015
Sheet 3 of 6
US 9,086,273 B1
210
2–
206
FIG. 2A
} 208
212
<– 200
FIG. 2C
210
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?