Hall v. City and County of San Francisco et al

Filing 56

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 55 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE TO NOVEMBER 15, 2017 filed by Brian Cheu, Emily Cohen, Kevin Ian Kitchingham, City and County of San Francisco Case Management Sta tement due by 11/8/2017. Initial Case Management Conference set for 11/15/2017 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on September 6, 2017. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/6/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 DENNIS J. HERRERA, State Bar #139669 City Attorney WAYNE SNODGRASS, State Bar #148137 TARA M. STEELEY, State Bar #231775 Deputy City Attorneys City Hall, Room 234 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place San Francisco, California 94102-4682 Telephone: (415) 554-4655 Facsimile: (415) 554-4699 E-Mail: tara.steeley@sfgov.org Attorneys for Defendants CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO; KEVIN KITCHINGHAM, in his official capacity; BRIAN CHEU, in his official capacity; and, EMILY COHEN, in her official capacity 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 14 PATRINA HALL, 15 Plaintiff, 16 vs. 17 18 19 20 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, KEVIN IAN KITCHINGHAM, PROJECT MANAGER, BRIAN CHEU, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, EMILY COHEN, Case No. C17-02161 JST STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE TO NOVEMBER 15, 2017 Defendants. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE CMC CASE NO. C17-02161 JST n:\govlit\li2017\171438\01218584.docx 1 2 3 4 5 WHEREAS, this Court entered an order to continue the Initial Case Management Conference to September 27, 2017. (See Docket No. 35, filed July 7, 2017); WHEREAS, Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint is set for hearing on October 5, 2017; WHEREAS, the parties request that the Court continue the Initial Case Management 6 Conference to November 15, 2017, at 2:00 p.m., subject to the Court’s availability, because continuing 7 the conference until after the October 5, 2017 Motion to Dismiss has been heard and decided will 8 conserve judicial resources and the parties’ resources. 9 10 11 12 Accordingly, pursuant to Local Civil Rule 6-2, the parties stipulate as follows: 1. Subject to the Court’s approval, the Initial Case Management Conference shall be continued to Wednesday, November 15, 2017, at 2:00 p.m., or to a date shortly thereafter; 2. The last day to file the Joint or Separate Case Management Statement, file the Rule 13 26(f) Report, and exchange initial disclosures shall be November 8, 2017. 14 Dated: September 6, 2017 15 DENNIS J. HERRERA City Attorney WAYNE SNODGRASS TARA M. STEELEY Deputy City Attorneys 16 17 18 By: /s/Tara M. Steeley TARA M. STEELEY Attorneys for Defendants CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO; KEVIN KITCHINGHAM, in his official capacity; BRIAN CHEU, in his official capacity; and, EMILY COHEN, in her official capacity By: 19 **/s/Patrina Hall PATRINA HALL Plaintiff, in pro per 20 21 22 23 Dated: September 6, 2017 24 25 26 27 28 **PURSUANT TO GO 45, THE ELECTRONIC SIGNATORY HAS OBTAINED APPROVAL FROM THIS SIGNATORY. STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE CMC CASE NO. C17-02161 JST 1 n:\govlit\li2017\171438\01218584.docx [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 2 For good cause appearing, the Court hereby ORDERS the following: 3 1. 4 5 Initial Case Management Conference, set for September 27, 2017, shall be continued to November 15, 2017 at 2:00 pm. 2. The last day to file the Joint or Separate Case Management Statement, file the Rule 6 26(f) Report, and exchange initial disclosures shall be one week prior to the conference, or November 7 8, 2017. 8 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 6, 2017 11 THE HONORABLE JON S. TIGAR Judge, United States District Court 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE CMC CASE NO. C17-02161 JST 2 n:\govlit\li2017\171438\01218584.docx

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?