Schieberl v. Berryhill

Filing 11

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO INFORM COURT WHETHER HE CONSENTS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE FOR ALL PURPOSES. Plaintiff is directed to advise the Court, no later than July 12, 2017, as to whether he consents to have a magistrate judge conduct all further proceedings in the instant action. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 06/21/17. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/21/2017)

1
2
3
4

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

TIM SCHIEBERL,
Plaintiff,

8
v.

9

NANCY A. BERRYHILL,

11
United States District Court
Northern District of California

10

Case No. 17-cv-02433-MMC
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO
INFORM COURT WHETHER HE
CONSENTS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE
FOR ALL PURPOSES

Defendant.

12
13

In cases initially assigned to a district judge, the parties may consent at any time to

14

reassignment of the case to a magistrate judge for all purposes, including entry of final

15

judgment. See Civil L.R. 73-1(b).

16

On June 21, 2017, defendant consented to have a magistrate judge conduct all

17

further proceedings in the instant action. Accordingly, plaintiff is hereby DIRECTED to

18

advise the Court, no later than July 12, 2017, as to whether he consents to have a

19

magistrate judge conduct all further proceedings in the instant action.1 For plaintiff’s

20

convenience, a consent form is attached hereto; forms are also available at

21

http://www.cand.uscourts.gov, in the “Forms” section.

22

The parties are further advised that they may jointly request assignment to a

23

specific magistrate judge. Because defendant has previously filed a general consent,

24

any such joint request must be made in a separate document filed concurrently with

25
26
27
28

1

Normally, the Court would direct the parties to so inform the Court in their Joint
Case Management Statement filed in connection with a case management conference.
Because the instant action involves a review of an administrative record, however, a case
management conference has not been scheduled.

1

plaintiff’s consent.

2
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
5
Dated: June 21, 2017
6

MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge

7
8
9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2