Davis v. Page Publishing Company et al
Filing
12
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; AFFORDING PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO AMEND. Should plaintiff wish to file an amended pleading for purposes of curing the deficiencies identified in the Magistrate Judge's Report a nd Recommendation, plaintiff shall file, no later than August 22, 2017, a First Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 08/08/17. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/8/2017) Modified on 8/8/2017 (mmclc2, COURT STAFF). (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/8/2017: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (tlS, COURT STAFF).
1
2
3
4
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
JIMMY LEE DAVIS,
Plaintiff,
8
9
v.
PAGE PUBLISHING COMPANY, et al.,
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
10
Defendants.
Case No. 17-cv-02973-MMC
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE
JUDGE’S REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION; AFFORDING
PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO AMEND
Re: Dkt. No. 10
12
13
Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler’s Report and
14
Recommendation, filed July 19, 2017, by which said Magistrate Judge recommends the
15
Court dismiss plaintiff’s complaint and afford plaintiff an additional two weeks to file an
16
amended complaint. No objection to the Report and Recommendation has been filed.
17
Having reviewed the matter de novo, the Court hereby ADOPTS the Report and
18
19
Recommendation in its entirety.
Accordingly, plaintiff’s complaint is hereby DISMISSED for failure to state a claim.
20
Should plaintiff wish to file an amended pleading for purposes of curing the deficiencies
21
identified in the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, plaintiff shall file, no
22
later than August 22, 2017, a First Amended Complaint.
23
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
26
27
28
Dated: August 8, 2017
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?