Ko v. Padilla
Filing
7
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 4/12/2018. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/12/2018)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
LILY KO,
Plaintiff,
8
Docket No. 6
ALEJANDRO PADILLA,
Defendant.
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
v.
9
10
Case No. 17-cv-04911-EMC
12
Upon initial review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, the Court determined that Plaintiff's
13
14
initial pleading failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted and granted Plaintiff leave
15
to file an amended complaint. See Docket No. 5. The Court cautioned Plaintiff that failure to file
16
an amended complaint by the deadline would result in the dismissal of this action. See id. at 8.
17
Plaintiff did not file an amended complaint, and the deadline by which to do so has long passed.
Although Plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint, she did file document entitled “writ
18
19
of mandamus to require records for court, for notice & instructions.” Docket No. 6. The
20
document requests the California Secretary of State to certify a record (identified only by a record
21
number) and file it in 19 federal court cases, several state agencies and courts, and about a dozen
22
federal agencies and courts. The document does not provide the information the Court directed
23
Plaintiff to provide in an amended complaint and fails to state a claim upon which relief may be
24
granted.
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
2
Accordingly, this action is dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be
granted. The Clerk shall close the file
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
Dated: April 12, 2018
7
8
9
______________________________________
EDWARD M. CHEN
United States District Judge
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?