Ko v. Padilla

Filing 7

ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 4/12/2018. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/12/2018)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

LILY KO,
Plaintiff,

8

Docket No. 6
ALEJANDRO PADILLA,
Defendant.

11
United States District Court
Northern District of California

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

v.

9
10

Case No. 17-cv-04911-EMC

12
Upon initial review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, the Court determined that Plaintiff's

13
14

initial pleading failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted and granted Plaintiff leave

15

to file an amended complaint. See Docket No. 5. The Court cautioned Plaintiff that failure to file

16

an amended complaint by the deadline would result in the dismissal of this action. See id. at 8.

17

Plaintiff did not file an amended complaint, and the deadline by which to do so has long passed.
Although Plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint, she did file document entitled “writ

18
19

of mandamus to require records for court, for notice & instructions.” Docket No. 6. The

20

document requests the California Secretary of State to certify a record (identified only by a record

21

number) and file it in 19 federal court cases, several state agencies and courts, and about a dozen

22

federal agencies and courts. The document does not provide the information the Court directed

23

Plaintiff to provide in an amended complaint and fails to state a claim upon which relief may be

24

granted.

25

///

26

///

27

///

28

///

1
2

Accordingly, this action is dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be
granted. The Clerk shall close the file

3
4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

5
6

Dated: April 12, 2018

7
8
9

______________________________________
EDWARD M. CHEN
United States District Judge

10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2