Ko v. Padilla

Filing 7

ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 4/12/2018. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/12/2018)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 LILY KO, Plaintiff, 8 Docket No. 6 ALEJANDRO PADILLA, Defendant. 11 United States District Court Northern District of California ORDER OF DISMISSAL v. 9 10 Case No. 17-cv-04911-EMC 12 Upon initial review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, the Court determined that Plaintiff's 13 14 initial pleading failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted and granted Plaintiff leave 15 to file an amended complaint. See Docket No. 5. The Court cautioned Plaintiff that failure to file 16 an amended complaint by the deadline would result in the dismissal of this action. See id. at 8. 17 Plaintiff did not file an amended complaint, and the deadline by which to do so has long passed. Although Plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint, she did file document entitled “writ 18 19 of mandamus to require records for court, for notice & instructions.” Docket No. 6. The 20 document requests the California Secretary of State to certify a record (identified only by a record 21 number) and file it in 19 federal court cases, several state agencies and courts, and about a dozen 22 federal agencies and courts. The document does not provide the information the Court directed 23 Plaintiff to provide in an amended complaint and fails to state a claim upon which relief may be 24 granted. 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 2 Accordingly, this action is dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The Clerk shall close the file 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 Dated: April 12, 2018 7 8 9 ______________________________________ EDWARD M. CHEN United States District Judge 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?