Ko v. Rosen

Filing 8

ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 4/12/2018. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/12/2018)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

LILY KO,

Case No. 17-cv-04914-EMC
Plaintiff,

8

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

9

v.

10

JEFFREY ROSEN,

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

Docket No. 7
Defendant.

12
13

Upon initial review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, the Court determined that Plaintiff's

14

initial pleading failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted and granted Plaintiff leave

15

to file an amended complaint. See Docket No. 6. The Court cautioned Plaintiff that failure to file

16

an amended complaint by the deadline would result in the dismissal of this action. See id. at 8.

17

Plaintiff did not file an amended complaint, and the deadline by which to do so has long passed.

18

Although Plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint, she did file document entitled “writ

19

of mandamus to withdraw beneficiary, re-appoint original beneficiary.” Docket No. 7. The

20

document makes no sense, does not provide the information the Court directed Plaintiff to provide

21

in an amended complaint, and fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.

22

Accordingly, this action is dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be

23

granted. The Clerk shall close the file

24

IT IS SO ORDERED.

25

Dated: April 12, 2018

26
27
28

______________________________________
EDWARD M. CHEN
United States District Judge