Ko v. Rosen
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 4/12/2018. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/12/2018)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case No. 17-cv-04914-EMC
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Docket No. 7
Upon initial review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, the Court determined that Plaintiff's
initial pleading failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted and granted Plaintiff leave
to file an amended complaint. See Docket No. 6. The Court cautioned Plaintiff that failure to file
an amended complaint by the deadline would result in the dismissal of this action. See id. at 8.
Plaintiff did not file an amended complaint, and the deadline by which to do so has long passed.
Although Plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint, she did file document entitled “writ
of mandamus to withdraw beneficiary, re-appoint original beneficiary.” Docket No. 7. The
document makes no sense, does not provide the information the Court directed Plaintiff to provide
in an amended complaint, and fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.
Accordingly, this action is dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be
granted. The Clerk shall close the file
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 12, 2018
EDWARD M. CHEN
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?