Xiaoning et al v. Yahoo! Inc, et al
Filing
74
Declaration of Alfred Po Tak Tsoi in Support of 73 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction filed byYahaoo! Holdings (Hong Kong), Ltd.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A-H# 2 Exhibit I)(Related document(s) 73 ) (Petrocelli, Daniel) (Filed on 8/27/2007) Modified on 8/28/2007 (cp, COURT STAFF).
Xiaoning et al v. Yahoo! Inc, et al
Doc. 74
Case 4:07-cv-02151-CW
Document 74
Filed 08/27/2007
Page 1 of 6
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
DANIEL PETROCELLI (S.B. #97802)
MATTHEW T. KLINE (S.B. #211640)
mkline@omm.com
dpetrocelli@omm.com
O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP 1999 Avenue Of The Stars Los Angeles, California 90067-6035 Telephone: (310) 553-6700 Facsimile: (310) 246-6779 Attorneys for Defendant YAHOO!, INC. and Specially Appearing Defendant YAHOO! HONG KONG LIMITED.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION WANG XIAONING, YU LING, SHI TAO, and ADDITIONAL PRESENTLY UNNAMED AND TO BE IDENTIFIED INDIVIDUALS, Plaintiff, v. YAHOO, INC., a Delaware Corporation, YAHOO! HONG KONG LIMITED, a Foreign Subsidiary of Yahoo! Inc., AND OTHER PRESENTLY UNNAMED AND TO BE IDENTIFIED INDIVIDUAL EMPLOYEES OF SAID CORPORATIONS, Defendant. Case No. C07-02151 CW DECLARATION OF ALFRED PO TAK TSOI IN SUPPORT OF SPECIALLY APPEARING DEFENDANT YAHOO! HONG KONG LIMITED'S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION Date: November 1, 2007 Time: 2 p.m. Location: Courtroom 2 Judge: Hon. Claudia Wilken
C07-02151 CW DECL. OF ALFRED TSOI
Dockets.Justia.com
Case 4:07-cv-02151-CW
Document 74
Filed 08/27/2007
Page 2 of 6
Case 4:07-cv-02151-CW
Document 74
Filed 08/27/2007
Page 3 of 6
Case 4:07-cv-02151-CW
Document 74
Filed 08/27/2007
Page 4 of 6
Case 4:07-cv-02151-CW
Document 74
Filed 08/27/2007
Page 5 of 6
Case 4:07-cv-02151-CW
Document 74
Filed 08/27/2007
Page 6 of 6
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?