Xiaoning et al v. Yahoo! Inc, et al

Filing 94

MOTION to Enlarge Time to Respond to Defendants' Motions to Dismiss and Associated Motions, Pending a Decision on Plaintiffs' Motion for Initial and Jurisdictional Discovery; Alternative Motion for an Enlargement of Time for Plaintiffs' Response filed by Wang Xiaoning, Shi Tao, Yu Ling. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Myers, Roger) (Filed on 9/14/2007) Modified on 9/17/2007 (cp, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
Xiaoning et al v. Yahoo! Inc, et al Doc. 94 Att. 1 Case 4:07-cv-02151-CW Document 94-2 Filed 09/14/2007 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION WANG XIAONING, YU LING, SHI TAO, and ADDITIONAL PRESENTLY UNNAMED AND TO BE IDENTIFIED INDIVIDUALS, Plaintiffs, v. Case No. C07-02151 CW [PROPOSED] ORDER ENLARGING TIME FOR PLAINTIFFS' OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS, PENDING A DECISION ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR INITIAL AND JURISDICTIONAL DISCOVERY TO RESPOND TO THE MOTIONS TO DISMISS YAHOO, INC., a Delaware Corporation, YAHOO! HONG KONG, LTD., a Foreign Subsidiary of Yahoo!, AND OTHER PRESENTLY UNNAMED AND TO BE IDENTIFIED CORPORATE DEFENDANTS Hon. Judge Claudia Wilken AND UNNAMED AND TO BE IDENTIFIED INDIVIDUAL EMPLOYEES OF SAID CORPORATIONS, Defendants. Having considered the Plaintiffs' motion for an order enlarging time for Plaintiffs to respond to Defendants' Motions to Dismiss and extending accompanying deadlines accordingly, and the declaration of Morton H. Sklar filed in support thereto, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED, with the Plaintiffs' opposition due either (1) 14 days after the conclusion of initial and jurisdictional discovery, or (2) 14 days after a decision denying initial and jurisdictional discovery, with the Defendants' reply due 21 days after Plaintiff's opposition is filed. The consolidated hearing on Plaintiffs' motion for initial and jurisdictional discovery and the Case Management Conference will be held on November 1, 2007, and the order regarding the motions for initial and jurisdictional discovery will schedule the hearing on the motions to dismiss and associated motions accordingly. In the Alternative Having considered the Plaintiffs' alternative motion for an order enlarging time for Plaintiffs to respond to Defendants' Motions to Dismiss and extending accompanying deadlines [Proposed] Order Enlarging Time for Plaintiffs' Response to Defendants' Motions to Dismiss and Associated Motions Case No. C07-02151 CW Dockets.Justia.com Case 4:07-cv-02151-CW Document 94-2 Filed 09/14/2007 Page 2 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 accordingly, and the declaration of Morton H. Sklar filed in support thereto, it is hereby ORDERED that the alternative motion is GRANTED, with the Plaintiffs' opposition due on October 17, 2007, the Defendants' response due on November 7, and the consolidated hearing on Defendants' motions to dismiss and associated motions, with the Case Management Conference, to be held on November 29. Dated: ________________________________ Judge Claudia Wilken United States District Court For the Northern District of California [Proposed] Order Enlarging Time for Plaintiffs' Response to Defendants' Motions to Dismiss and Associated Motions -2- Case No. C07-02151 CW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?