Google Inc. v. Netlist, Inc.

Filing 83

MOTION to Relate Case and Consolidate: C-09-5718-CRB, filed by Netlist, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order and Stipulation)(Pruetz, Adrian) (Filed on 12/17/2009) Modified on 12/18/2009 (jlm, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Howard G. Pollack (CA Bar No. 162897/pollack@fr.com) Shelley K. Mack (CA Bar No. 209596/mack@fr.com) Robert J. Kent (CA Bar No. 250905/rjkent@fr.com) FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 500 Arguello Street, Suite 500 Redwood City, CA 94063 Telephone: (650) 839-5070 Facsimile: (650) 839-5071 Attorneys for Plaintiff GOOGLE INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (OAKLAND DIVISION) GOOGLE INC., Plaintiff, v. NETLIST, INC., Defendant. AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS. Notice is hereby given of the withdrawal of Seth M. Sproul of Fish & Richardson P.C., as counsel of record for Plaintiff Google Inc. ("Google"). Howard J. Pollack, Shelley Mack and Robert Kent of Fish & Richardson P.C. will continue to act as counsel for Google and are not affected by this withdrawal. Dated: November 18, 2009 FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. By: /s/ Howard G. Pollack Howard G. Pollack Attorneys for Plaintiff GOOGLE INC. 10954661.doc Case No. C 08-04144 SBA (JCS) NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF SETH M. SPROUL NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF SETH M. SPROUL Case No. C 08-04144 SBA (JCS) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 10954661.doc CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned hereby certifies that on November 18, 2009, all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to electronic service are being served with a copy of the NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF SETH M. SPROUL via the Court's CM/ECF system per Local Rule 5-4 and General Order 45. Any other counsel of record will be served by first class mail. /s/ Howard G. Pollack Howard G. Pollack 2 NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF SETH M. SPROUL Case No. C 08-04144 SBA (JCS)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?