Ross v. Potter et al

Filing 17

STIPULATION AND ORDER REFERRING CASE to Mediation.. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 1/9/09. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/9/2009) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/9/2009: # 1 Certificate of Service) (lrc, COURT STAFF). Modified on 1/12/2009 (jlm, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 JOSEPH P. RUSSONEILLO, CSBN 44332 United States Attorney 2 JOANN M. SWANSON, CSBN 88143 Chief, Civil Division 3 EDWARD A. OLSEN, CSBN 214150 Assistant United States Attorney 4 450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055 San Francisco, California 94102 5 Telephone: (415) 436-6915 FAX: (415) 436-6927 6 7 Attorneys for Defendant 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 RONALD LEE ROSS, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION ) No. C 08-4423-SBA ) ) ) ) STIPULATION AND ORDER ) SELECTING ADR PROCESS ) ) ) ) JOHN E. POTTER, Postmaster General 15 United States Postal Service, 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Defendant. Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, and the Defendant, by and through his attorneys of record, have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: Mediation with a courtconnected mediator. // // // // // // ADR STIPULATION C 08-4423-SBA 1 1 Dated: December 23, 2008 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ADR STIPULATION C 08-4423-SBA 2 Dated: December 23, 2008 Respectfully submitted, JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO United States Attorney /s/ EDWARD A. OLSEN Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Defendant /s/ RONALD ROSS Pro Se ORDER Pursuant to the stipulation set forth above, the above-caption matter is referred to: Mediation IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated:1/9/09 __________________________________ SAUNDRA B. ARMSTRONG United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?