Lam et al v. City and County of San Francisco et al

Filing 140

ORDER by Judge Hamilton Denying 137 Motion to Demand Defendants' Counsel to Temporarily Postpone Discovery (pjhlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/5/2011) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/5/2011: # 1 Certificate of Service) (nah, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
Lam et al v. City and County of San Francisco et al Doc. 140 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ALFRED LAM, et al., 8 Plaintiff, 9 v. 10 No. C 08-4702 PJH ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DEMAND DEFENDANTS' COUNSEL TO TEMPORARILY POSTPONE DISCOVERY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, et al., Defendants. _______________________________/ 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The court is in receipt of plaintiffs' motion to demand defendants' counsel to temporarily postpone any further discovery, and defendants' opposition thereto. Plaintiffs' request for an extension of discovery deadlines and/or a suspension of discovery is DENIED, since, for the reasons advanced by defendants, plaintiffs have failed to present any good cause justifying the grant of such a request. Plaintiffs are further instructed to file with the court a statement containing all plaintiffs' contact information, no later than April 18, 2011. However, as plaintiffs now proceed in pro per, they are not required to comply with electronic case filing requirements. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 5, 2011 ______________________________ PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?