Vietnam Veterans of America et al v. Central Intelligence Agency et al

Filing 540

***DISREGARD, SEE DOCKET NO. 541 *** NOTICE OF INTENDED AMENDED ORDER, INJUNCTION AND JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 10/11/2013. (Attachments: # 1 amended order, # 2 judgment, # 3 injunction)(ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/11/2013) Modified on 10/11/2013 (ndr, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 5 VIETNAM VETERANS OF AMERICA et al., Plaintiffs, 6 7 8 9 10 v. No. CV 09-0037-CW INTENDED INJUNCTION PURSUANT TO THE COURT’S SUMMARY JUDGMENT ORDER CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, et al., Defendants. ________________________________/ United States District Court For the Northern District of California WHEREAS, the Court has granted Plaintiffs summary judgment 11 that Defendant Department of the Army has an ongoing duty to warn 12 members of the class about newly acquired information that may 13 affect their well-being now and in the future as it becomes 14 available, and good cause appearing therefor; 15 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that said Defendant is enjoined as 16 follows: 17 1. This injunction pertains only to individuals who, while 18 serving in the armed forces, were test subjects in any testing 19 program in which humans were exposed to a chemical or biological 20 substance for the purpose of studying or observing the effects of 21 such exposure (that was sponsored, overseen, directed, funded, 22 and/or conducted by the Department of the Army). Defendant shall 23 provide such test subjects with newly acquired information that 24 may affect their well-being that it has learned since its original 25 notification, now and in the future as it becomes available, as 26 set forth below. 27 28 1 2. This injunction applies only to information that may 2 affect the well-being of test subjects that has been acquired by 3 the Department of the Army and/or its agents since June 30, 2006. 4 Specifically, as the Court has ruled, the Department of the Army 5 shall provide each test subject with any new information it has 6 required with regard to: 7 a. 8 undergone by that particular test subject; 9 b. The nature, duration, and purpose of the testing The method and means by which the testing was United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 conducted; 11 c. 12 expected by that test subject as a result of 13 participation in the testing; and 14 d. 15 come from such participation. The inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be The effects upon their health which may possibly 16 Such information is referred to hereafter as the “Newly 17 Acquired Information”; 18 3. 19 20 Class members who became test subjects before August 8, 1988, shall be notified of Newly Acquired Information; 4. Within thirty (30) days of the date of entry of this 21 injunction (the “Entry Date”), the Department of the Army shall 22 file with the Court a report: 23 a. 24 the Newly Acquired Information as of the Entry Date from 25 the various sources of information available to it, 26 which may include, but are not limited to, such sources 27 as the Chem-Bio Database, the Mustard Gas Database, the 28 Chemical, Biological, Radiological & Nuclear Defense describing the efforts it has undertaken to locate 2 1 Information Analysis Center (“CBRNIAC”) Database and 2 other related databases created in conjunction with 3 Battelle Memorial Institute, and the Defense Technical 4 Information Center (“DTIC”) repository; 5 b. 6 been found and describing generally its nature; 7 c. 8 developed for transmitting Newly Acquired Information to 9 the class members entitled to notification, including confirming whether Newly Acquired Information has explaining the plan it has in its discretion United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 the methods intended for notification which may include 11 direct mail, online notice, and/or publication notice; 12 d. 13 Information as of the Entry Date to those class members 14 no later than ninety (90) days from the Entry Date, and 15 outlining its plan to do so; and 16 e. 17 discretion developed for (i) periodically collecting and 18 transmitting Newly Acquired Information that becomes 19 available to it after the Entry Date and (ii) providing 20 any necessary update reports to the Court regarding such 21 future efforts. 22 23 24 5. committing to transmit the Newly Acquired outlining the plan and policies it has in its The Court retains jurisdiction to enforce the terms of this Injunction and Order. IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 27 Dated: CLAUDIA WILKEN United States District Judge 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?