Gregory v. City and County of San Francisco et al

Filing 44

BRIEFING ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman on 7/21/2010. (Attachments: # 1 Proof of Service)(bzsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/21/2010)

Gregory v. City and County of San Francisco et al

Doc. 44

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2010. KENNETH M. GREGORY, v. Plaintiff(s), ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

No. C09-1800 PJH (BZ) BRIEFING ORDER

CITY & COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Defendant(s).

Plaintiff filed a motion to compel discovery on June 6, In response to the motion to compel, I ordered the

parties to meet and confer, which they did on June 30, 2010. Defendant's counsel submitted an opposition to the motion on July 9, 2010, stating that she thought that all discovery issues had been resolved, but that if plaintiff needed more documents, defendant would consider the requests so long as defendants could do so "without undue burden." Opp. at 1. On

July 16, 2010, plaintiff filed a reply to defendant's opposition to the motion to compel, claiming that he needs further discovery. In light of plaintiff's reply, it appears

all discovery issues were not settled during the parties' meet 1
Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

and confer session. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendant file an opposition to plaintiff's reply by July 30, 2010. Plaintiff shall file a If the Court

reply to that opposition by August 9, 2010.

feels a hearing is necessary it shall set one. To the extent plaintiff seeks to reopen discovery, his requests should be made with Judge Hamilton. Dated: July 21, 2010 Bernard Zimmerman United States Magistrate Judge
G:\BZALL\-REFS\GREGORY V. CITY & CTY S.F\DISC ORDER 2.wpd

2