O'Bannon, Jr. v. National Collegiate Athletic Association et al

Filing 186

RESPONSE (re #179 MOTION to Strike the Declaration of Daniel L. Rubinfeld ) filed byNational Collegiate Athletic Association. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Proposed Order)(Pomerantz, Glenn) (Filed on 6/6/2014)

1 GLENN D. POMERANTZ (State Bar No. 112503)
[e-mail]
2 KELLY M. KLAUS (State Bar No. 161091)
[e-mail]
3 CAROLYN HOECKER LUEDTKE (State Bar No. 207976)
[e-mail]
4 ROHIT K. SINGLA (State Bar No. 213057)
[e-mail]
5 MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP
560 Mission Street
6 Twenty-Seventh Floor
San Francisco, California 94105-2907
7 Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
8
GREGORY L. CURTNER (Pro Hac Vice)
9 [e-mail]
ROBERT J. WIERENGA (State Bar No. 183687)
10 [e-mail]
KIMBERLY K. KEFALAS (Pro Hac Vice)
11 [e-mail]
SCHIFF HARDIN LLP
12 350 Main St., Suite 210
Ann Arbor, MI 48104
13 Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
14
Attorneys for Defendant
15 National Collegiate Athletic Association
16
17

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

18

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND DIVISION

19
20 EDWARD O’BANNON, et al.,

Case No. 4:09-CV-3329-CW

21

[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING
PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO STRIKE THE
DECLARATION OF DANIEL L.
RUBINFELD

Plaintiffs,
22
v.
23
NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC
24 ASSOCIATION; COLLEGIATE
LICENSING COMPANY; and
25 ELECTRONIC ARTS INC.,

Judge: Hon. Claudia Wilken, Chief Judge

26 Defendants.
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO STRIKE
CASE NO. 4:09-CV-3329-CW

1
2

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Antitrust Plaintiffs’ Motion to Strike the Declaration of

3 Dr. Daniel L. Rubinfeld, Dkt. No. 179, is DENIED.
4
5
6
7
8

DATED: _______________________
CLAUDIA WILKEN
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO STRIKE
CASE NO. 4:09-CV-3329-CW