O'Bannon, Jr. v. National Collegiate Athletic Association et al
Filing
193
Proposed Order - Antitrust Plaintiffs' Proposed Form of Injunction by Edward C. O'Bannon, Jr.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Gosselin, Sathya) (Filed on 6/6/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
MICHAEL D. HAUSFELD (pro hac vice)
mhausfeld@hausfeldllp.com
HILARY K. SCHERRER (SBN 209451)
hscherrer@hausfeldllp.com
SATHYA S. GOSSELIN (SBN 269171)
sgosselin@hausfeldllp.com
SWATHI BOJEDLA (pro hac vice)
sbojedla@hausfeldllp.com
HAUSFELD LLP
1700 K Street, NW, Suite 650
Washington, DC 20006
Telephone: (202) 540-7200
Facsimile: (202) 540-7201
12
MICHAEL P. LEHMANN (SBN 77152)
mlehmann@hausfeldllp.com
BRUCE J. WECKER (SBN 78530)
bwecker@hausfeldllp.com
HAUSFELD LLP
44 Montgomery Street, 34th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: (415) 633-1908
Facsimile: (415) 358-4980
13
Antitrust Plaintiffs’ Class Counsel
8
9
10
11
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
OAKLAND DIVISION
17
18
19
Case No. 4:09-cv-3329 CW
EDWARD O’BANNON, et al.,
20
21
22
Plaintiffs,
v.
24
NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC
ASSOCIATION; COLLEGIATE
LICENSING COMPANY; and
ELECTRONIC ARTS INC.,
25
ANTITRUST PLAINTIFFS’ PROPOSED
FORM OF INJUNCTION
Judge:
The Honorable Claudia Wilken
Courtroom: 2, 4th Floor
Trial:
June 9, 2014
Defendants.
23
26
27
28
ANTITRUST PLAINTIFFS’ PROPOSED FORM OF
INJUNCTION
CASE NO. 4:09-CV-3329-CW
1
Pursuant to the direction of the Court at the May 28, 2014 pretrial hearing and the order
2
resolving motions in limine (Keller Dkt. No. 1105 at 12), attached as Exhibit A is the Antitrust
3
Plaintiffs’ Proposed Form of Injunction, without prejudice to further modification at trial. This
4
proposal is based in part on injunctions entered in cases such as Board of Regents of Univ. of
5
Okla. v. NCAA, 601 F.Supp. 307, 308 (W.D. Okla. 1984); Mackey v. NFL, 407 F.Supp. 1000,
6
1011 (D. Minn. 1975), aff’d, 543 F.2d 606 (8th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 701 (1977); and
7
the “Third Amended Judgment and Final Decree” (Feb. 12, 2014) (Dkt. No. 835) in In re Vitamin
8
C Antitrust Litig., No. 1:06-md-01738-BMC-JO (E.D.N.Y.).
9
10
Dated: June 6, 2014
Respectfully submitted,
By: /s/ Michael P. Lehmann
Michael P. Lehmann (Cal. Bar No. 77152)
Bruce J. Wecker (Cal. Bar No. 78530)
HAUSFELD LLP
44 Montgomery St., 34th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: (415) 633-1908
Facsimile: (415) 358-4980
E-mail: mlehmann@hausfeldllp.com
bwecker@hausfeldllp.com
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
Michael D. Hausfeld (pro hac vice)
Hilary K. Scherrer (Cal. Bar No. 209451)
Sathya S. Gosselin (Cal. Bar. No. 269171)
Swathi Bojedla (pro hac vice)
HAUSFELD LLP
1700 K Street, NW, Suite 650
Washington, DC 20006
Telephone: (202) 540-7200
Facsimile: (202) 540-7201
E-mail: mhausfeld@hausfeldllp.com
hscherrer@hausfeldllp.com
sgosselin@hausfeldllp.com
sbojedla@hausfeldllp.com
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Antitrust Plaintiffs’ Class Counsel
26
27
28
ANTITRUST PLAINTIFFS’ PROPOSED FORM OF
INJUNCTION
1
CASE NO. 4:09-CV-3329-CW
1
2
3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on June 6, 2014, I served the foregoing document on counsel by filing
it via the Court’s CM/ECF system, which will send an email notice to all registered parties.
4
/s/ Sathya S. Gosselin
Sathya S. Gosselin
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ANTITRUST PLAINTIFFS’ PROPOSED FORM OF
INJUNCTION
2
CASE NO. 4:09-CV-3329-CW
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?