Hopkins v. San Francisco Police Department et al
Filing
86
ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken 81 APPOINTING COUNSEL AND SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE DATE. (Attachments: # 1 Order for Pretrial Preparation, # 2 Certificate/Proof of Service). (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/11/2012)
1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
KEVIN LAMAR HOPKINS,
4
Plaintiff,
5
6
No. C 09-04578 CW (PR)
ORDER APPOINTING COUNSEL
AND SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE DATE
v.
SAN FRANCISCO POLICE OFFICER
CHARLES AUGUST,
(Docket no. 81)
7
Defendants.
8
/
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
The Court having determined that it would be beneficial to
11
have counsel assist Plaintiff in this matter and volunteer counsel
12
willing to be appointed to represent Plaintiff having been located
13
by the Court,
14
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Daniel Robinson of Covington &
15
Burling LLP is appointed as counsel for Plaintiff in this matter
16
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 1915(e)(1) and the Court's Federal Pro Bono
17
Project guidelines.
18
this Order to Jocelyn Whitley, Legal Projects Coordinator of the
19
Volunteer Legal Service Program of the San Francisco Bar
20
Association.
21
Order to Plaintiff, and to Defendant's counsel.
22
The Clerk of the Court shall send a copy of
The Clerk of the Court shall also send a copy of this
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT a case management conference will
23
be held on Wednesday, February 29, 2012, at 2:00 p.m.
24
shall comply with the attached Order for Pretrial Preparation.
25
//
26
//
27
//
28
//
Counsel
1
2
3
4
5
In light of the appointment of counsel, Plaintiff's motion for
appointment of counsel (docket no. 81) is GRANTED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: 1/11/2012
CLAUDIA WILKEN
United States District Judge
6
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?