Hopkins v. San Francisco Police Department et al

Filing 86

ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken 81 APPOINTING COUNSEL AND SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE DATE. (Attachments: # 1 Order for Pretrial Preparation, # 2 Certificate/Proof of Service). (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/11/2012)

Download PDF
1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 KEVIN LAMAR HOPKINS, 4 Plaintiff, 5 6 No. C 09-04578 CW (PR) ORDER APPOINTING COUNSEL AND SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE DATE v. SAN FRANCISCO POLICE OFFICER CHARLES AUGUST, (Docket no. 81) 7 Defendants. 8 / 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 The Court having determined that it would be beneficial to 11 have counsel assist Plaintiff in this matter and volunteer counsel 12 willing to be appointed to represent Plaintiff having been located 13 by the Court, 14 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Daniel Robinson of Covington & 15 Burling LLP is appointed as counsel for Plaintiff in this matter 16 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 1915(e)(1) and the Court's Federal Pro Bono 17 Project guidelines. 18 this Order to Jocelyn Whitley, Legal Projects Coordinator of the 19 Volunteer Legal Service Program of the San Francisco Bar 20 Association. 21 Order to Plaintiff, and to Defendant's counsel. 22 The Clerk of the Court shall send a copy of The Clerk of the Court shall also send a copy of this IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT a case management conference will 23 be held on Wednesday, February 29, 2012, at 2:00 p.m. 24 shall comply with the attached Order for Pretrial Preparation. 25 // 26 // 27 // 28 // Counsel 1 2 3 4 5 In light of the appointment of counsel, Plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel (docket no. 81) is GRANTED. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: 1/11/2012 CLAUDIA WILKEN United States District Judge 6 7 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?