Petroliam Nasional Berhad v. GoDaddy.com, Inc.

Filing 150

Declaration of JOSEPH G. FIORINO IN in Support of 149 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Notice of Motion, Motion and Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Go Daddy's Administrative Motion to Seal filed byGoDaddy.com, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C)(Related document(s) 149 ) (Lansky, David) (Filed on 12/2/2011)

EXHIBIT C

Case4:09-cv-05939-PJH Document133

Filed11/18/11 Page1 of 2

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7
8

Plaintiff,

No. C 09-5939 PJH

11
For the Northern District of California

PETROLIAM NASIONAL BERHAD,

10

United States District Court

9

v.

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION TO SEAL IN PART AND
DENYING IT IN PART

12

GODADDY.COM, INC.,

13

Defendant.
_______________________________/

14
15

Before the court is the motion of plaintiff Petrolam Nasional Berhad (Doc. 119) for an

16

order filing under seal plaintiff’s memorandum of points and authorities in support of its

17

motion for partial summary judgment, and the appendix of materials in support of the

18

motion, on the basis that those documents cite to documents that defendant

19

GoDaddy.com, Inc. has designated as confidential. Defendant has filed supporting

20

declarations, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5(d). Having considered the papers and

21

materials submitted, the court hereby GRANTS the motion in part and DENIES it in part.

22

The court finds that compelling reasons exist for sealing (1) GoDaddy.com’s

23

standard operating procedure for dealing with trademark claims (“SOP”) found at pages

24

165-173 of plaintiff’s appendix; and (2) portions of the transcript of the October 19, 2011

25

deposition of Jeff Munson, found on page 11 at lines 4-10 and 14-16, page 13 at lines 9-13,

26

page 14 at lines 7-24, page 16 at lines 1-25, page 17 at lines 1-4, page 19 at lines 6-9 and

27

22-24, page 22 at lines 6-8, page 23 at lines 3-7and 17-25, and all of pages 24-26 which

28

are located within pages 187-190 of plaintiff’s. Accordingly, the motion is GRANTED as to

Case4:09-cv-05939-PJH Document133

Filed11/18/11 Page2 of 2

1

those documents. Pursuant to General Order 62, plaintiff is instructed to e-file the above

2

portions of the appendix under seal.

3

The motion is DENIED as to the remaining portions of the appendix, and as to

4

plaintiff’s memorandum of points and authorities in support of its motion for partial summary

5

judgment. Pursuant to General Order 62, plaintiff is instructed to e-file these documents in

6

the public record. (A copy of the public portions of the appendix is attached as Exhibit A to

7

defendant’s proposed order (Doc. 124-2) re plaintiff’s motion to seal.)

8

referred to the “Electronic Case Filing” page on the court’s website, to the links for “E-filing

9

Under Seal in CIVIL Cases,” and “File Size Limits and What Not to E-file.”

Plaintiff is

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10
IT IS SO ORDERED.

12

Dated: November 18, 2011
______________________________
PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON
United States District Judge

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2