Johnson v. United States
Filing
47
ORDER REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT DATES AND INTERROGATORIES. Signed by Judge Beeler on 4/14/11. (lblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/14/2011) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/14/2011: # 1 Certificate of Service) (ls, COURT STAFF).
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
Northern District of California
10
Oakland Division
JAMES ELLIS JOHNSON,
12
For the Northern District of California
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
Plaintiff,
v.
13
No. C 10-00647 LB
ORDER REGARDING CASE
MANAGEMENT DATES AND
INTERROGATORIES
UNITED STATES,
14
15
16
17
[ECF No. 46]
Defendant.
_____________________________________/
On April 14, 2011, the court held a case management conference with the parties. The parties
agreed to modify the case management dates as follows:
18
Case Event
19
Further Case Management Conference
6/9/11
20
Non-Expert Discovery Completion
6/10/11
21
Expert Disclosures
6/10/11
22
Rebuttal Expert Disclosures
6/25/11
23
Expert Discovery Completion
7/25/11
Last Hearing for Dispositive Motions
8/25/11 at 11:00 a.m.
Meet and Confer Regarding Pretrial Filings
8/29/11
Pretrial Filings Due
9/8/11
26
Opposition, Objections, Exhibits, and Depo Designations Due
9/13/11
27
Final Pretrial Conference
9/22/11 at 10:30 a.m.
24
25
28
C 10-00647 LB
ORDER RE CASE MANAGEMENT DATES & INTERROGATORIES
Date
1
Case Event
Date
2
Trial
10/3/11 at 8:30 a.m.
3
Length of Trial
4 days
4
Mr. Johnson will serve the United States with 30 interrogatories. Mr. Johnson will either re-
5
submit 30 interrogatories from the ones that he has already served on the United States or he will
6
submit 30 new interrogatories.
7
This terminates ECF No. 46.
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
9
10
_______________________________
LAUREL BEELER
United States Magistrate Judge
12
For the Northern District of California
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
Dated: April 14, 2011
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
C 10-00647 LB
ORDER RE CASE MANAGEMENT DATES & INTERROGATORIES
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?