Riley v. Roach et al

Filing 34

ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken Granting 31 Motion for Extension of Time to File. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service) (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/5/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 OAKLAND DIVISION 11 12 SHANNON RILEY, Case No. C 10-2088 CW (PR) 13 14 v. Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE DISPOSITIVE MOTION 15 16 17 S. ROACH, et al., Defendants. 18 19 Defendants S. Roach and E. Morris moved under Local Rule 6-3 for an extension of time, 20 up to and including June 13, 2011, to file a dispositive motion. The Court has read and 21 considered Defendants’ request, and good cause appearing, 22 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants’ request for an extension of time up to and 23 including June 13, 2011, to file a dispositive motion is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s opposition to 24 Defendants’ dispositive motion shall be filed with the court and served on Defendants no later 25 than 60 days after Defendants file their dispositive motion. If Defendants wish to file a reply 26 brief, they shall do so no later than 30 days after Plaintiff files his opposition. 27 28 5/5/2011 Dated: ___________________________ __________________________ The Honorable Claudia Wilken 1 [Proposed] Order Granting Defs.’ Mot Ext. Time File Disp. Mot. (C 10-2088 CW (PR))

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?