Riley v. Roach et al

Filing 34

ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken Granting 31 Motion for Extension of Time to File. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service) (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/5/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

OAKLAND DIVISION

11
12
SHANNON RILEY,

Case No. C 10-2088 CW (PR)

13
14
v.

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF
TIME TO FILE DISPOSITIVE MOTION

15
16
17

S. ROACH, et al.,
Defendants.

18
19

Defendants S. Roach and E. Morris moved under Local Rule 6-3 for an extension of time,

20

up to and including June 13, 2011, to file a dispositive motion. The Court has read and

21

considered Defendants’ request, and good cause appearing,

22

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants’ request for an extension of time up to and

23

including June 13, 2011, to file a dispositive motion is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s opposition to

24

Defendants’ dispositive motion shall be filed with the court and served on Defendants no later

25

than 60 days after Defendants file their dispositive motion. If Defendants wish to file a reply

26

brief, they shall do so no later than 30 days after Plaintiff files his opposition.

27
28

5/5/2011
Dated: ___________________________

__________________________
The Honorable Claudia Wilken
1

[Proposed] Order Granting Defs.’ Mot Ext. Time File Disp. Mot. (C 10-2088 CW (PR))