McCamey v. San Francisco Co. Sheriff Dept.

Filing 5

ORDER OF DISMISSAL, ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 7/15/10. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service)(nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/15/2010)

Download PDF
McCamey v. San Francisco Co. Sheriff Dept. Doc. 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 vs. SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, Defendant. / ROYALTON McCAMEY, Plaintiff, No. C 10-2419 PJH (PR) ORDER OF DISMISSAL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA United United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 This pro se civil rights action was filed on June 1, 2010. On that same day the court notified plaintiff that his application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis ("IFP") was deficient because the "Certificate of Funds in Inmate Account," page five of the form, was not signed, and because he had not provided the printout of transactions in his inmate account required by 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(2). A copy of the court's form for applications to proceed in forma pauperis was provided with the notice, along with a return envelope. Plaintiff was informed that if he did not either pay the fee or remedy the deficiencies of his IFP application within thirty days the case would be dismissed. Plaintiff has filed another IFP application, but the certificate on page five still is not signed, and no printout of transactions has been provided. This case therefore is DISMISSED without prejudice. The clerk shall close this file. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 15, 2010. PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON United States District Judge P:\PRO-SE\PJH\HC.10\McCAMEY2419.DSM-IFP.wpd

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?