Conway v. Geithner et al

Filing 12

ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' 4 MOTION TO DISMISS AND VACATING HEARING. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 3/3/2011. (Attachments: # 1 Certficate of Mailing)(ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/3/2011) Modified on 3/3/2011 (ndr, COURT STAFF). ** SIGNATURE MISSING, SEE DOCKET NO. 13 **

Conway v. Geithner et al

Doc. 12

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Pro se Plaintiff filed a small claims action against the above-named Defendants in San Mateo Superior Court. 30, 2010, the action was removed to federal court. On December On January 6, Docket v. TIMOTHY GEITHNER, WENDY DEVIND aka WENDY DEVINE, ROGER VAN CLEVE, ELIZABETH WARREN, AND DERRICK SELTON, Defendants. ________________________________/ ANDREW J. CONWAY, Plaintiff, No. C 10-05962 CW ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS AND VACATING HEARING IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

2011, Defendants moved to dismiss Plaintiff's action. No. 4.

Since then, the case has been reassigned to the

undersigned, and the hearing for the motion was renoticed for March 17, 2011. Plaintiff's opposition to Defendants' motion was due on February 24, 2011. opposition. Thus far, Plaintiff has failed to file an

Plaintiff shall file his opposition by March 17,

2011, or the action will be dismissed for failure to prosecute. If Plaintiff responds by March 17, 2011, Defendants shall submit their reply by March 24, 2011. The hearing set for March 17, 2011

Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

is VACATED. hearing.

If necessary, the Court will set a new date for the

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 3/3/2011

CLAUDIA WILKEN United States District Judge

2