Conway v. Geithner et al
Filing
13
ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' 4 MOTION TO DISMISS AND VACATING HEARING. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on Claudia Wilken. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Mailing)(ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/3/2011)
Conway v. Geithner et al
Doc. 13
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Pro se Plaintiff filed a small claims action against the above-named Defendants in San Mateo Superior Court. 30, 2010, the action was removed to federal court. On December On January 6, Docket v. TIMOTHY GEITHNER, WENDY DEVIND aka WENDY DEVINE, ROGER VAN CLEVE, ELIZABETH WARREN, AND DERRICK SELTON, Defendants. ________________________________/ ANDREW J. CONWAY, Plaintiff, No. C 10-05962 CW ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS AND VACATING HEARING IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
2011, Defendants moved to dismiss Plaintiff's action. No. 4.
Since then, the case has been reassigned to the
undersigned, and the hearing for the motion was renoticed for March 17, 2011. Plaintiff's opposition to Defendants' motion was due on February 24, 2011. opposition. Thus far, Plaintiff has failed to file an
Plaintiff shall file his opposition by March 17,
2011, or the action will be dismissed for failure to prosecute. If Plaintiff responds by March 17, 2011, Defendants shall submit their reply by March 24, 2011. The hearing set for March 17, 2011
Dockets.Justia.com
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
is VACATED. hearing.
If necessary, the Court will set a new date for the
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: 3/3/2011
CLAUDIA WILKEN United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?