Emblaze Ltd. v. Apple Inc.

Filing 105

MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint, filed by Apple Inc.. Motion Hearing set for 7/17/2012 01:00 PM in Courtroom 1, 4th Floor, Oakland before Hon. Saundra Brown Armstrong. Responses due by 5/29/2012. Replies due by 6/5/2012. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Barrows, Sarah) (Filed on 5/14/2012) Modified on 5/15/2012 (jlm, COURT STAFF).

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

3

OAKLAND DIVISION

4

EMBLAZE LTD.,

5

Plaintiff,

6

CASE NO. 4:11-CV-01079 SBA

v.

7
8

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
APPLE’S MOTION UNDER FED. R. CIV.
P. 12(B)(6) TO DISMISS EMBLAZE’S
AMENDED COMPLAINT UPON WHICH
RELIEF CAN BE GRANTED

APPLE INC., a California Corporation,
Defendants.

9
10

After reviewing Defendant Apple Inc.’s Motion Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) to

11

Dismiss Plaintiff Emblaze’s Amended Complaint For Failure to State a Claim Upon Which

12

Relief Can Be Granted (“Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss”), Plaintiff’s Response and the

13

pleadings and files of record, and after being fully advised, NOW THEREFORE,

14
15

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Defendant’s Motion

16

to Dismiss is GRANTED, and that Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint against Defendant Apple

17

Inc. is dismissed [with] [without] prejudice.

18
19

Dated: ________________________

20
21
Honorable Saundra Brown Armstrong
Judge of the United States Court
Northern District of California

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[Proposed] Order Granting Motion to Dismiss
Amended Complaint

-1-

Case No. 4:11-CV-01079 SBA