Emblaze Ltd. v. Apple Inc.

Filing 108

STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Extending Deadlines on Apple's Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint, filed by Emblaze Ltd., Apple Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Ferrari, Lisa) (Filed on 5/23/2012) Modified on 5/24/2012 (jlm, COURT STAFF).

1 Martin L. Fineman (CA State Bar No. 104413)
DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP
2 505 Montgomery Street, Suite 800
San Francisco, California 94111
[phone]
3 Telephone:
Facsimile:
[phone]
[e-mail]
4 Email:
5 Martin B. Pavane (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
Lisa A. Ferrari (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
6 COZEN O’CONNOR
277 Park Avenue
7 New York, New York 10172
Telephone: [phone]
8 Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
9
10 Attorneys for Plaintiff
Emblaze Ltd.
11
[JOINT FILING – SEE SIGNATURE PAGE FOR DEFENDANT’S COUNSEL]
12
13
14

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15

THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

16

OAKLAND DIVISION

17
EMBLAZE LTD.,
18
Plaintiff,
19
v.
20
APPLE INC.,
21
Defendant.
22
23

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. C 11-01079 SBA
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINES ON
APPLE’S MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST
AMENDED COMPLAINT
Judge: Hon. Saundra Brown Armstrong

Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1 of the United States District Court for the Northern District of

24 California, the parties, Plaintiff Emblaze Ltd. (“Emblaze”) and Defendant Apple Inc. (“Apple”),
25 through their undersigned counsel, stipulate as follows:
26

Whereas, on May 14, 2012, Apple filed a motion to dismiss Emblaze’s First Amended

27 Complaint [D.E. 105], making Emblaze’s opposition to the motion due May 29, 2012, and
28

Apple’s reply to Emblaze’s opposition due June 5, 2012.
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
EXTENDING DEADLINES ON APPLE’S MOTION TO DISMISS
FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
Emblaze Ltd. v. Apple Inc., Case No. C 11-01079 SBA

1

Whereas, counsel for Emblaze consulted with counsel for Apple, and Apple does not

2 oppose extending the briefing schedule on the motion to dismiss so as to make Emblaze’s
3 opposition due June 5, 2012, and Apple’s reply due June 14, 2012.
4

Whereas, the hearing on Apple’s motion to dismiss is currently scheduled for July 17,

5 2012, at 1:00 p.m., so that making the requested changes to the briefing schedule on Apple’s
6 motion to dismiss will not require changing the hearing date on the motion or any other dates in
7 the Scheduling Order.
8

Now, therefore, the parties hereby stipulate that Emblaze’s opposition to Apple’s motion to

9 dismiss, currently due May 29, 2012, shall be due June 5, 2012, and Apple’s reply to Emblaze’s
10 opposition, currently due June 5, 2012, shall be due June 14, 2012.
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22

Date: May 23, 2012

___/s/ _Martin L. Fineman___________
Martin L. Fineman (CA State Bar No. 104413)
DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP
505 Montgomery Street, Suite 800
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Email:
[e-mail]
Martin B. Pavane (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
Lisa A. Ferrari (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
COZEN O’CONNOR
277 Park Avenue
New York, New York 10172
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email:
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Counsel for Plaintiff

23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINES
ON APPLE’S MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
Emblaze Ltd. v. Apple Inc., Case No. C 11-01079 SBA

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

Date: May 23, 2012

__/s/ James J. DeCarlo__________
James J. DeCarlo (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
Scott J. Bornstein (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
Julie P. Bookbinder (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
GREENBERG TRAURIG
200 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10166
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Kenneth Steinthal (CA State Bar No. 268655)
[e-mail]
Sarah Barrows (CA State Bar No. 253278)
[e-mail]
GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP
4 Embarcadero Center
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Michael A. Nicodema (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP
200 Park Avenue
Florham Park, NJ 07932
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Counsel for Defendant

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINES
ON APPLE’S MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
Emblaze Ltd. v. Apple Inc., Case No. C 11-01079 SBA

1
2
3
4
5
6

ATTESTATION CLAUSE
I, Lisa A. Ferrari, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO RESCHEDULE MARKMAN HEARING AND
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby
attest that James J. DeCarlo, attorney at Greenberg Traurig, LLP, concurred in this filing on behalf
of defendant’s attorneys of record.

7
8

Dated: May 23, 2012

COZEN O’CONNOR

9
By: /s/ Lisa A. Ferrari
Lisa A. Ferrari

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINES
ON APPLE’S MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
Emblaze Ltd. v. Apple Inc., Case No. C 11-01079 SBA