Perry v. AT&T Mobility LLC et al
Filing
96
ORDER by Judge GONZALEZ ROGERS granting 90 Motion for Preliminary Approval of Settlement (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/9/2013) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/9/2013: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Exhibit, # 3 Exhibit) (lrc, COURT STAFF).
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
13
14
15
16
SANDRA PERRY, ARMAKIA
MARINER-REED and PATRYCE
COUNTS, individuals, on behalf of
themselves, and on behalf of all
persons similarly situated; and JASON
HILTON, an individual,
17
18
19
20
21
Plaintiffs,
v.
ARISE VIRTUAL SOLUTIONS INC.,
a Delaware Corporation,
Case No. C 11-01488 YGR
CLASS ACTION
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS
ACTION SETTLEMENT (AS MODIFIED
BY THE COURT)
Hearing Date:
Time:
Courtroom:
Judge:
Defendant.
December 11, 2012
2:00 p.m.
5, Second Floor
Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez
Rogers
22
23
Plaintiffs’ Motion for an order granting preliminary approval of the settlement of
24
the above-captioned action on a class basis, approving the manner and content of notices
25
to the classes, and setting a final approval hearing, came on for hearing in Courtroom
26
Five, Second Floor, of this Court on December 11, 2012.
27
28
Having read the Joint Stipulation of Class Action Settlement and Release, [Doc.
No. 90] (the “Settlement Agreement”), the motion for preliminary approval, as well as the
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PRELIM. APPROVAL | CASE NO. C 11-01488 YRG
1
points and authorities and declarations filed in support thereof, and having heard the
2
parties’ argument, this Court finds that: the proposed settlement appears fair, reasonable,
3
and adequate, and falls within the range of possible approval meriting submission to
4
potential class members; notices of the proposed settlement should be sent to the
5
settlement classes in the manner described herein; and a hearing should be held after said
6
notices are issued to determine if the Settlement Agreement and settlement are fair,
7
reasonable, and adequate, to the settlement classes and if an order granting final approval
8
should be entered in this action based upon the terms of the Settlement Agreement.
9
10
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
1.
Defined Terms. This Order incorporates by reference the parties’ Joint
11
Stipulation of Class Action Settlement and Release, on file with this Court, and all defined
12
terms herein shall have the same meaning as set forth in the Settlement Agreement.
13
2.
Class Action. This action is provisionally certified for class treatment for
14
settlement purposes only and pursuant to the parties’ Settlement Agreement, with the
15
Settling Classes defined as the following:
16
a)
All individuals who provided customer service or technical
17
support services on applications for AT&T Mobility LLC
18
accounts, while located in the State of California, pursuant to
19
Statements of Work with Arise Virtual Solutions Inc. during the
20
period March 28, 2007 through to August 31, 2012; and,
21
b)
All individuals who provided customer service or technical
22
support services on applications for Apple Inc. accounts, while
23
located in the State of California, pursuant to Statements of
24
Work with Arise Virtual Solutions Inc. during the period
25
December 8, 2007 through to August 31, 2012.
26
3.
Proposed Settlement. The Court grants preliminary approval to the
27
terms set forth in the Settlement Agreement between the parties. The Court finds
28
that the proposed settlement is the product of informed, non-collusive, and arm’s2
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PRELIM. APPROVAL | CASE NO. C 11-01488 YGR
1
length negotiations. The proposed settlement between the Settling Classes and
2
Defendant appears, upon preliminary review, to be within the range of
3
reasonableness and accordingly shall be submitted to the Class Members for their
4
consideration and for a hearing to determine whether the settlement shall be finally
5
approved by the Court.
6
4.
Appointment of Class Counsel. Norman Blumenthal and Kyle
7
Nordrehaug, of Blumenthal, Nordrehaug & Bhowmik LLP, are appointed Class
8
Counsel for settlement purposes.
9
5.
Approval of Class Representative. Named Plaintiffs Sandra Perry,
10
Armakia Mariner-Reed, and Patryce Counts are approved as adequate
11
representatives of the Settling Classes for purposes of settlement.
12
6.
Notice and Claim Form. The Court finds that the mailing of the
13
Notice and related materials substantially in the manner and form as set forth in the
14
Settlement Agreement and this Order meet the requirements of due process, is the
15
best notice practicable under the circumstances, and shall constitute due and
16
sufficient notice to all persons entitled thereto. Accordingly, by no later than
17
February 7, 2013 (20 business days after the date of this order), the parties,
18
through the independent Claims Administrator, Gilardi & Co., LLC, shall provide
19
notice of settlement (“Class Notice”), a claim form (“Claim Form”) and a request
20
for exclusion form (“Request for Exclusion”) to all Class Members by first class
21
mail to their last known address according to the information that will be provided
22
to the Claims Administrator by Defendant pursuant to Paragraph 26 of the
23
Settlement Agreement. The Class Notice shall be substantially in the form
24
attached hereto as Exhibit #1. The Request for Exclusion shall be substantially in
25
the form attached hereto as Exhibit #2. The Claim Form shall be substantially in
26
the form attached hereto as Exhibit #3. The Claims Administrator shall make such
27
further efforts as are possible and reasonable (if any), to provide an applicable
28
Class Notice to each member of the Settling Classes whose original Class Notice is
3
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PRELIM. APPROVAL | CASE NO. C 11-01488 YGR
1
returned as undeliverable. All Class Members who have not responded to the Class
2
Notices shall be mailed a reminder notice on the fortieth (40th) day after the date of
3
mailing of the Class Notices and claims forms.
4
7.
Exclusions/“Opt Outs.” Class Members may exclude themselves
5
from the Settlement Class by mailing the Claims Administrator a signed and dated
6
Request for Exclusion. To be timely, all such requests for exclusion or opt-outs
7
must be postmarked no later than forty-five (45) days from the date the Class
8
Notices are first mailed. Arise shall have the right, but not the obligation, to revoke
9
the settlement if more than ten percent (10%) of the Class Members, as measured
10
on a headcount or Compensable Interval basis, exclude themselves from the
11
settlement.
12
8.
Claim Forms. Class Members who wish to be paid their allocation
13
of the settlement fund must submit a signed Claim Form to the Claims
14
Administrator, postmarked no later than sixty (60) days from the date of mailing of
15
the Class Notices and Claim Forms. Class Members who do not file a Claim Form
16
or Request for Exclusion shall not share in the distribution of the Net Settlement
17
Value, but nevertheless shall be bound by the dismissal with prejudice and the
18
release of claims set out in the Settlement Agreement, assuming the Court grants
19
Final Approval.
20
9.
Settlement Administration. The parties shall retain the services of
21
Gilardi & Co., LLC for the administration of this settlement, and said entity is
22
hereby appointed Claims Administrator. The Claims Administrator’s fees and
23
costs shall be capped at twenty thousand dollars and no cents ($20,000.00).
24
10.
Final Hearing. A final hearing shall be held on Tuesday, May 14,
25
2013 at 2:00 p.m., in Courtroom 5 of the United States District Court, Northern
26
District, before Honorable Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers to consider whether the Court
27
should grant final approval of the settlement.
28
a)
Objections to the proposed settlement by Class Members will
4
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PRELIM. APPROVAL | CASE NO. C 11-01488 YGR
1
be considered by the Court if mailed to the Claims
2
Administrator with a postmark of no later than forty-five (45)
3
days from the date the Class Notices are first mailed.
4
b)
Members of the Settling Classes will also be notified by the
5
Class Notices that they may appear at the Court hearing
6
scheduled for final approval of the Settlement to have
7
objections heard by the Court. Objections not previously filed
8
in writing in a timely manner will not be considered.
9
c)
Counsel for the Settling Classes and counsel for Defendant
10
should be prepared at the hearing to respond to any objections
11
filed by the Class Members and to provide other information,
12
as appropriate, bearing on whether or not the settlement
13
should be approved.
14
d)
Class Counsel’s application for fees and costs pursuant to
15
Paragraph 45 of the Settlement Agreement, as well as Class
16
Counsel’s application for enhancement awards pursuant to
17
Paragraph 46 of the Settlement Agreement, shall be scheduled
18
for determination at the Final Approval Hearing, but Class
19
Counsel’s applications shall be filed and served before the
20
Class Notices are mailed and shall be posted on Class
21
Counsel’s website and the Claims Administrator’s website.
22
11.
Failure of Settlement. In the event the proposed settlement as
23
provided in the Settlement Agreement is not approved by the Court, or for any
24
reason the parties fail to obtain a final approval order as contemplated in the
25
Settlement Agreement, or the Settlement Agreement is terminated or voided
26
pursuant to its terms, the Settlement Agreement and all orders in connection
27
therewith, shall become null and void and of no further force or effect, and shall
28
not be used or referred to for any purpose whatsoever. In such event, the
5
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PRELIM. APPROVAL | CASE NO. C 11-01488 YGR
1
Settlement Agreement, and all negotiations and proceedings relating thereto shall
2
be withdrawn without prejudice as to the rights of any and all parties thereto.
3
This Order terminates Dkt. No. 90.
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
7
8
DATED: January 9, 2013
_____________________________________
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
6
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PRELIM. APPROVAL | CASE NO. C 11-01488 YGR
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?