Reyes et al v. WMC Mortgage Corporation et al

Filing 68

ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR PLAINTIFFS AMENDED COMPLAINT. Amended Pleadings due by 4/25/2012. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 4/10/2012. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/10/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11

JOSE REYES, an individual;
LOURDES SANTOS-REYES, an
individual,

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

Plaintiffs,

No. C 11-1988 CW
ORDER EXTENDING
DEADLINE FOR
PLAINTIFFS’
AMENDED COMPLAINT

v.
WMC MORTGAGE CORPORATION, a
California Corporation; OCWEN
LOAN SERVICING LLC, a Delaware
Limited Liability Company; WELLS
FARGO BANK, N.A.; TD SERVICE
COMPANY, a Business Entity, form
unknown; CRESTLINE FINANCIAL &
MARKETING SERVICE, a Business
Entity, form unknown; MORTGAGE
ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS,
INC., a Delaware Corporation,
Defendants.
________________________________/
On March 23, 2012, the Court ordered Plaintiffs, pursuant to

22
Local Rule 3-11(b), to provide the Court with a current address.
23
Rule 3-11(b) requires the attorney or pro se party to submit to
24
the Court, within sixty days of returned mail, a written
25
communication indicating a current address, or face dismissal of
26
the case without prejudice for failure to prosecute.
27
have failed to comply thus far.
28

Plaintiffs

1

On March 28, 2012, the Court granted the motions to dismiss

2

submitted by Defendants Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC; Wells Fargo

3

Bank, N.A., as Trustee for the Pooling and Servicing Agreement

4

Dated as of June 1, 2004 Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investors Trust

5

Mortgage Loan Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2004-WMC4,

6

erroneously sued as Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.; Mortgage Electronic

7

Registration Systems, Inc.; and WMC Mortgage Corporation.

8

Court allowed Plaintiffs until April 11, 2012, two weeks following

9

the date of the order, to file an amended complaint.

The

The Court’s

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10

March 28, 2012 order was mailed to pro se Plaintiffs at their

11

address of record, 2613 Glen Harwick Court, San Jose, CA 95148-

12

2541.

13

undeliverable.

14

However, on April 6, 2012, the mail was returned as

On April 9, 2012, the Court resent the order to a second,

15

possible address for Plaintiffs, provided by Defendants, 1625

16

Tully Road #A, San Jose, CA 95122.

17

mailing, the Court extends the deadline for Plaintiffs to amend

18

their complaint to April 25, 2012.

19

Given the date of this second

Again, Plaintiffs are reminded of their obligation to update

20

their address of record, or face dismissal of their action for

21

failure to prosecute.

22

IT IS SO ORDERED.

23
24
25

Dated: 4/10/2012

CLAUDIA WILKEN
United States District Judge

26
27
28
2