Pimental v. Google, Inc. et al

Filing 37

Memorandum in Opposition re 34 Motion to Stay Discovery filed by Jessica Franklin, Nicole Pimental. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Reis, Sean) (Filed on 10/31/2011) Modified on 11/1/2011 (jlm, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 SEAN REIS (SBN 184044) (sreis@edelson.com) EDELSON MCGUIRE LLP 30021 Tomas Street, Suite 300 Rancho Santa Margarita, California 92688 Telephone: (949) 459-2124 Facsimile: (949) 459-2123 JORDAN L. LURIE (130013) (jlurie@weisslurie.com) JOEL E. ELKINS (256020) (jelkins@weisslurie.com) WEISS & LURIE 10940 Wilshire Blvd, 23rd Floor Los Angeles, CA 90024 Telephone: (310) 208-2800 Facsimile: (310) 209-2348 11 12 Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the Putative Class 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION 14 15 16 17 NICOLE PIMENTAL and JESSICA FRANKLIN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 18 19 20 21 Plaintiffs, v. GOOGLE INC., a Delaware corporation, and SLIDE, INC., a Delaware corporation, 22 Defendants. 23 24 25 26 27 28 11-cv-02585-SBA Case No. 11-cv-02585-SBA Consolidated with: Case No. 11-cv-3333-SBA [PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR A TEMPORARY STAY OF DISCOVERY Courtroom 1, 4th Floor Hon. Sandra Brown Armstrong 1 2 The Court, having considered Defendants’ Administrative Motion for a Temporary Stay of Discovery, and Plaintiffs’ Opposition thereto, hereby orders as follows: 3 Defendant’s Administrative Motion for a Temporary Stay of Discovery is DENIED. 4 Discovery shall proceed according to the Court’s Case Management Scheduling Order. (Dkt. No. 33). 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 8 Dated: ____________ 9 ____________________________________________ HONORABLE SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 11-cv-02585-SBA 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?