Pimental v. Google, Inc. et al

Filing 46

MOTION to Strike 40 Memorandum in Opposition, filed by Google, Inc., Slide, Inc.. Responses due by 12/6/2011. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration, # 2 Proposed Order)(Wilson, Bobbie) (Filed on 12/2/2011) Modified on 12/5/2011 (jlm, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 PERKINS COIE LLP BOBBIE J. WILSON (Bar No. 148317) JOSHUA A. REITEN (Bar No. 238985) Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 2400 San Francisco, CA 94111-4131 Telephone: (415) 344-7000 Facsimile: (415) 344-7050 E-mail: bwilson@perkinscoie.com 5 6 7 8 9 DEBRA R. BERNARD (Pro hac vice) 131 S. Dearborn St., Suite 1700 Chicago, IL 60603 Telephone: (312) 324-8559 Facsimile: (312) 324-9559 E-mail: dbernard@perkinscoie.com Attorneys for Defendants GOOGLE INC. and SLIDE, INC. 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 OAKLAND DIVISION 14 15 16 NICOLE PIMENTAL and JESSICA FRANKLIN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 17 18 19 Plaintiffs, v. GOOGLE INC., a Delaware corporation, and SLIDE, INC., a Delaware corporation, 20 Defendants. 21 22 This Document Relates to All Actions. 23 24 25 26 27 28 WILSON DECL. ISO ADMIN. MOT. TO STRIKE Case No. 11-cv-02585-SBA Case No. 11-cv-02585-SBA DECLARATION OF BOBBIE J. WILSON IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS’ ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR AN ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFFS’ BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS Place: Judge: Courtroom 1, 4th Floor Hon. Saundra Brown Armstrong 1 I, Bobbie J. Wilson, declare: 2 1. I am a member of the State Bar of California and a partner at the law firm Perkins 3 Coie LLP, which is counsel for Defendants Google Inc. and Slide, Inc. in this case. I make this 4 declaration in support of Defendants’ Administrative Motion For An Order Striking Plaintiffs’ 5 Brief In Opposition To Defendants’ Motion To Dismiss. I have personal knowledge of the facts 6 set forth herein. 7 2. On November 11, 2011, Plaintiffs filed their 23-page opposition to Defendants’ 8 motion to dismiss. Dkt. 40. Plaintiffs did not file an administrative motion seeking leave to file a 9 brief in excess of this Court’s maximum page limit. 10 3. Defendants have not attempted to obtain a stipulation in support of this motion 11 because Plaintiffs’ 23-page opposition has already been filed in violation of the Court’s Standing 12 Orders and there is nothing that Defendants could stipulate to that would retroactively authorize 13 Plaintiffs’ filing of an overlong brief. 14 15 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 2nd day of December, 2011. 16 By: /s/ Bobbie J. Wilson BOBBIE J. WILSON 17 18 Attorneys for Defendants GOOGLE INC. and SLIDE, INC. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -1WILSON DECL. ISO ADMIN. MOT. TO STRIKE Case No. 11-cv-02585-SBA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?