Pimental v. Google, Inc. et al

Filing 46

MOTION to Strike 40 Memorandum in Opposition, filed by Google, Inc., Slide, Inc.. Responses due by 12/6/2011. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration, # 2 Proposed Order)(Wilson, Bobbie) (Filed on 12/2/2011) Modified on 12/5/2011 (jlm, COURT STAFF).

1
2
3
4

PERKINS COIE LLP
BOBBIE J. WILSON (Bar No. 148317)
JOSHUA A. REITEN (Bar No. 238985)
Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 2400
San Francisco, CA 94111-4131
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-mail:
[e-mail]

5
6
7
8
9

DEBRA R. BERNARD (Pro hac vice)
131 S. Dearborn St., Suite 1700
Chicago, IL 60603
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-mail:
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants
GOOGLE INC. and SLIDE, INC.

10
11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

13

OAKLAND DIVISION

14
15
16

NICOLE PIMENTAL and JESSICA
FRANKLIN, individually and on behalf of
all others similarly situated,

17
18
19

Plaintiffs,
v.
GOOGLE INC., a Delaware corporation,
and SLIDE, INC., a Delaware corporation,

20
Defendants.
21
22

This Document Relates to All Actions.

23
24
25
26
27
28
WILSON DECL. ISO ADMIN. MOT. TO STRIKE
Case No. 11-cv-02585-SBA

Case No. 11-cv-02585-SBA
DECLARATION OF BOBBIE J. WILSON
IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS’
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR AN
ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFFS’ BRIEF
IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’
MOTION TO DISMISS
Place:
Judge:

Courtroom 1, 4th Floor
Hon. Saundra Brown Armstrong

1

I, Bobbie J. Wilson, declare:

2

1.

I am a member of the State Bar of California and a partner at the law firm Perkins

3

Coie LLP, which is counsel for Defendants Google Inc. and Slide, Inc. in this case. I make this

4

declaration in support of Defendants’ Administrative Motion For An Order Striking Plaintiffs’

5

Brief In Opposition To Defendants’ Motion To Dismiss. I have personal knowledge of the facts

6

set forth herein.

7

2.

On November 11, 2011, Plaintiffs filed their 23-page opposition to Defendants’

8

motion to dismiss. Dkt. 40. Plaintiffs did not file an administrative motion seeking leave to file a

9

brief in excess of this Court’s maximum page limit.

10

3.

Defendants have not attempted to obtain a stipulation in support of this motion

11

because Plaintiffs’ 23-page opposition has already been filed in violation of the Court’s Standing

12

Orders and there is nothing that Defendants could stipulate to that would retroactively authorize

13

Plaintiffs’ filing of an overlong brief.

14
15

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the
foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 2nd day of December, 2011.

16
By: /s/ Bobbie J. Wilson
BOBBIE J. WILSON

17
18

Attorneys for Defendants
GOOGLE INC. and SLIDE, INC.

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-1WILSON DECL. ISO ADMIN. MOT. TO STRIKE
Case No. 11-cv-02585-SBA