Streetspace, Inc v. Google, Inc. et al

Filing 21

MOTION to Dismiss Rule 12(B)(6) Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, For a More Definite Statement by Millennial Media, Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum In Support of Motion)(Kyle, John). Added MOTION for More Definite Statement on 1/19/2011 (kaj).

1
2
3
4

COOLEY LLP
JOHN S. KYLE (CA 199196)
[e-mail]
4401 Eastgate Mall
San Diego, California 92121
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

5
6
7
8
9
10
11

FRANK V. PIETRANTONIO (pro hac vice pending)
[e-mail]
CHRISTOPHER C. CAMPBELL (pro hac vice pending)
[e-mail]
One Freedom Square
11951 Freedom Drive
Reston, VA 20190-5656
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

12

Attorneys for Defendants
MILLENIAL MEDIA, INC.

13

Additional parties and counsel listed in the signature block

14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
17
STREETSPACE, INC.,

Case No. 3:10-CV-01757-LAB-AJB

18
Plaintiff,

19
20
21
22
23
24
25

v.
GOOGLE INC.; ADMOB, INC.; APPLE
INC.; QUATTRO WIRELESS, INC.; NOKIA
CORPORATION; NOKIA INC.; NAVTEQ
CORPORATION; MILLENIAL MEDIA,
INC.; JUMPTAP, INC.; and DOES 1 through
20,

RULE 12(B)(6) MOTION TO DISMISS OR, IN
THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR A MORE DEFINITE
STATEMENT
Date:
Time:
Judge:

March 14, 2011
11:15 a.m.
Hon. Larry Alan Burns

Defendants.

26
27
28
COOLEY LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW

CASE NO. 10-CV-1757-LAB-AJB

RULE 12(B)(6) MOTION TO DISMISS OR, IN THE
ALTERNATIVE, FOR A MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT

1

TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

PLEASE

TAKE NOTICE THAT

TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF

TAKE NOTICE THAT

the Defendants collectively will and hereby do move the

RECORD:
PLEASE

Court to enter an Order dismissing Plaintiff Streetspace, Inc.’s (“Streetspace”) Complaint or in
the alternative, Defendants request that the Court require Streetspace to provide a more definite
statement pursuant to Rule 12(e) as set forth in greater detail in the accompanying papers in
support of this motion.

10
11

Dated: January 18, 2011

COOLEY LLP

12
13

/s/John S. Kyle

14

JOHN S. KYLE ([e-mail])

15

Attorneys for Defendants
MILLENNIAL MEDIA, INC.

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
COOLEY LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW

Case No. 10-cv-1757-LAB-AJB

1.

MOTION TO DISMISS OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR A
MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT

1
2

_/s/Luann L. Simmons_____________________
George A. Riley (SB# 118304)
[e-mail]
Luann L. Simmons (SB# 203526)
[e-mail]
Anne E. Huffsmith (SB# 236438)
[e-mail]
O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

3
4
5
6
7
8
9

Attorneys for Defendants APPLE INC. and
QUATTRO WIRELESS, INC.

10
11
12

/s/ Shawn E. McDonald
Foley & Lardner LLP
MATTHEW B. LOWRIE (Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
111 Huntington Avenue, Suite 2600
Boston, MA 02119-7610
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 617.342.4001

13
14
15
16
17

Foley & Lardner LLP
SHAWN E. MCDONALD (CSB NO. 237580)
[e-mail]
JUSTIN E. GRAY (Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
3579 Valley Centre Drive, Suite 300
San Diego, CA 92130
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 858.792.6773

18
19
20
21
22
23

Attorneys for Defendants Google Inc. and
AdMob, Inc.

24
25
26
27
28
COOLEY LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW

Case No. 10-cv-1757-LAB-AJB

2.

MOTION TO DISMISS OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR A
MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT

1
__/s/David Heskel Ben-Meir_______________
David Heskel Ben-Meir
[e-mail]
ALSTON & BIRD LLP
333 South Hope Street, 16th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071
[phone]
Fax: [phone]

2
3
4
5
6

Attorney for Defendants NOKIA, INC., NOKIA
CORPORATION, and NAVTEQ, INC.

7
8
9

_/s/Kurt M. Kjelland_______________________
Kurt M. Kjelland
[e-mail]
GOODWIN PROCTER LLP
4365 Executive Drive
Third Floor
San Diego, CA 92121
[phone]
Fax: [phone]

10
11
12
13
14
15

Attorney for Defendant JUMPTAP, INC.

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
COOLEY LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW

Case No. 10-cv-1757-LAB-AJB

3.

MOTION TO DISMISS OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR A
MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT

1

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

2
The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing
3

document has been served on January 18, 2011, to all counsel of record who are deemed to

4

have consented to electronic service via the Court’s CM/ECF system per Civil Local Rule 5.4.

5

Any counsel of record who have not consented to electronic service through the Court’s

6

CM/ECF system will be served by electronic mail, first class mail, facsimile and/or overnight

7

delivery.

8
9
/s/ John Kyle_________
John Kyle, Esq.

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
COOLEY LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW

Case No. 10-cv-1757-LAB-AJB

4.

MOTION TO DISMISS OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR A
MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT