Streetspace, Inc v. Google, Inc. et al

Filing 40

REPLY to Response to Motion re 29 MOTION to Disqualify Counsel for Millennial Media (Cooley LLP) MOTION to Disqualify Counsel for Millennial Media (Cooley LLP) filed by Streetspace, Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Trevor Coddington, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Exhibit B, # 4 Exhibit C, # 5 Proof of Service)(Fazio, James) (lmt).

EXHIBIT A

2003 WL 25952592 (Bd.Pat.App. & Interf.)

Page 1

For Opinion See 2010 WL 429233 , 2009 WL 3793380 , 2009 WL 3837018
Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences.
Ex Parte NTP, INC.
Application No. 90/006,677.
June 24, 2003.
Applicant: Campana, Jr. et al.
Patent: 5,479,472
Title: System for Interconnecting Electronic Mail Systems By RF Communications and Method of Operation
Thereof
TC/Art Unit: 2645
Examiner: Scott Weaver
Docket No. 49671.000006
Confirmation No.: 5442
Appeal Brief
Of Counsel:, Brian M. Buroker, Registration No. 39,125, Christopher C. Campbell, Registration No. 37,291, Hunton
& Williams LLP, 1900 K Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20006-1109, Telephone: [phone], Facsimile:
[phone].
In response to the Office Action dated August 22, 2006, rejecting claims 1-62 and 112- 157 appellants respectfully
request that the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences reconsider and withdraw the rejections of record, and
allow the pending claims, which are attached hereto as an Appendix A.
I. REAL PARTY IN INTEREST
The real party in interest is NTP, Inc., the assignee of the above-referenced application.
II. RELATED APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES
This appeal is related to the co-pending appeal of the final rejections in the following reexamination proceedings:
1) Reexamination proceeding for U.S. Patent No. 5,436,960 assigned Control Nos. 90/006,533; 90/006,675 and
90/007,731.
3) Reexamination proceeding for U.S. Patent No. 5,438,611 assigned Control No. 90/006,676.
4) Reexamination proceeding for U.S. Patent No. 5,625,670 assigned Control Nos. 90/006533; 90/006678 and
90/007723.
5) Reexamination proceeding for U.S. Patent No. 5,631,946 assigned Control Nos. 90/006,492 and 90/006,679.

© 2011 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works.

2003 WL 25952592 (Bd.Pat.App. & Interf.)

Page 63

submission for ex parte reexamination proceedings.
Patent Owner strongly disagreed with the Office's position in the Decision and filed a Petition to reconsider the Office's Decision. The Office denied the Petition to reconsider on August 22, 2006. Patent Owner filed a petition to
reconsider its decision on October 23, 2006. Patent Owner may also take other actions to ensure that the record for
review by the Board is complete. As such, Patent Owner reserves the right to supplement the record for appeal with
evidence, argument and other information in the future.
IX. CONCLUSION
Patent Owner contends that the Final Office Action should be reversed on each and every ground of rejection and
objection. The Board is respectfully requested to direct the Office to issue a Notice of Intent to Issue a Reexamination Certificate and to terminate the above-identified merged reexamination proceedings.
Patent Owner also authorizes the Director to credit any fees required to the undersigned's Deposit Account No.
XXXXXXX.
Dated: December 19, 2006
Sturm & Fix, LLP
Midland Building
206 Sixth Avenue, 1213
Des Moines, IA 50309-4076
[phone] (telephone)
[phone] (facsimile)
Carl I. Brundidge
Registration No.: 29,621
Mattingly, Stanger, Malur & Brundidge, P.C.
1800 Diagonal Road, Suite 370
Alexandria, VA 22314
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
END OF DOCUMENT

© 2011 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works.