Haynes v. Hanson et al
ORDER CONTINUING COMPLIANCE DATE Compliance Hearing set for 11/30/2012 is CONTINUED TO Friday, 1/18/2013 09:01 AM before Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers.. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 11/29/12. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/29/2012)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
GREGORY M. HAYNES,
Case No.: 11-CV-5021 YGR
ORDER CONTINUING COMPLIANCE DATE
CHRISTIAN HANSON, BRENDA TOLBERT, DOE
ALMARZ, PHILIP COUGHLIN, MOSEH P.
OBERSEIN, DENNIS HERRERA, JOANE HOEPER,
DANIEL MURPHY AND DANIEL ZAHEER,
United States District Court
Northern District of California
On September 4, 2012, this Court issued an Order to Show Cause re: Dismissal for Failure
to Prosecute. (Dkt. No. 16.) In response to that Order to Show Cause, Plaintiff requested and was
granted until October 26, 2012, to file proofs of service as to all defendants. On October 30, 2012,
Plaintiff filed a Statement Re: Service indicating that he had not completed service and sought
additional time to serve them. (Dkt. No. 18.) The Court again extended Plaintiff’s time to file
proofs of service or an explanation of his failure to do so no later than November 16, 2012. (Dkt
No. 20.) Plaintiff has timely filed a statement indicating that some, but not all, defendants have
been served. (Dkt. No. 21.)
In light of the status of service, the Court CONTINUES the compliance hearing set for Friday,
November 30, 2012, to January 18, 2013, at 9:01 a.m. Plaintiff is ORDERED to file proofs of
service of summons as to all unserved defendants no later than January 4, 2013. Should Plaintiff
fail to have served the remaining defendants by that time, the Court is inclined to dismiss the claims
as to those defendants.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Date: November 29, 2012
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?