Bonilla v. Goodfellow et al

Filing 7

ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 4/11/2012. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/11/2012)

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

3
IN RE STEVEN BONILLA,

Nos. C 12-0360 CW (PR)
C 12-0388 CW (PR)
C 12-0976 CW (PR)

4
Plaintiff.
5

/
ORDER OF DISMISSAL

6
7
8

In 2011, Plaintiff filed thirty-six pro se civil rights

9

actions in this Court, and two other civil rights actions he had

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10

filed in state court were removed to this Court.

11

so far, filed seven new civil rights actions.

12

on its initial review of Plaintiff's complaints pursuant to 28

13

U.S.C. § 1915A, has dismissed all thirty-eight of the 2011 actions

14

and three of the 2012 actions for the reason that the allegations

15

in the complaints do not state a claim for relief under § 1983,

16

either because Plaintiff seeks relief that can be pursued only in a

17

habeas corpus action or because his allegations fail to state a

18

claim upon which relief may be granted.

19

dismissed a number of Plaintiff's actions because they are

20

duplicative of actions previously reviewed and dismissed by the

21

Court.

22

In 2012, he has,

To date, the Court,

In addition, the Court has

The present three actions are subject to dismissal for the

23

same reasons discussed above, i.e., they seek relief not available

24

under § 1983 and are duplicative of actions previously reviewed and

25

dismissed by the Court.

26

without leave to amend and with prejudice.

27
28

Accordingly, these actions are DISMISSED

Plaintiff seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis in these
actions.

The Court previously informed Plaintiff that, in

1

accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), he no longer qualifies to

2

proceed in forma pauperis in any civil rights action he files in

3

this Court.

4

(PR), Order of Dismissal at 6:23-7:19.

5

provide Plaintiff with the option of paying, in full, the $350.00

6

filing fee for each action because each action is without legal

7

merit.

8
9

See In re Steven Bonilla, Nos. C 11-3180, et seq. CW

The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment in each of these
civil rights actions, terminate all pending motions therein, and

10
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

Further, the Court will not

close the files.

11

this Order in C 08-0471.

The Clerk of the Court also shall file a copy of

12
IT IS SO ORDERED.
13
Dated:

4/11/2012

14
CLAUDIA WILKEN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2