Perez v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 15

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND VACATING MAY 30, 2012 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 5/25/2012. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/25/2012)

Download PDF
1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 JOSE PEREZ, Plaintiff, 5 6 7 8 No. C 12-0788 CW v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK NA, et al., Defendant. ________________________________/ ORDER DISMISSING ACTION FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND VACATING MAY 30, 2012 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 Plaintiff Jose Perez filed an application for leave to 11 proceed in forma pauperis (IFP). 12 assigned to a magistrate judge who determined that it was 13 incomplete. 14 information requested by the magistrate judge, she wrote a report 15 and recommendation that the IFP application be denied without 16 prejudice because the information provided was insufficient to 17 determine whether the IFP application had merit. 18 Plaintiff’s IFP application was After Plaintiff failed to provide supplemental On May 10, 2012, the Court issued an order adopting the 19 magistrate judge’s report and recommendation. 20 that, within seven days, Plaintiff could re-file his IFP 21 application or re-file his complaint with the filing fee. 22 Court warned Plaintiff that failure to take either action would 23 result in dismissal of his case without prejudice. 24 25 26 27 28 The order stated The 1 Because Plaintiff has failed to take any action, this case is 2 dismissed without prejudice. 3 scheduled for May 30, 2012 at 2:00 pm is vacated. 4 The case management conference IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 7 Dated: 5/25/2012 CLAUDIA WILKEN United States District Judge 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?