Jose Luis Natividad v. Figueroa

Filing 17

ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers granting 13 Motion to Change Name of Respondent; granting 14 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re 12 MOTION to Dismiss Habeas Corpus Petition as Untimely Responses due by 3/12/2013. Replies due by 3/26/2013. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/12/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 6 7 8 No. C 12-00891 YGR (PR) JOSE L. NATIVIDAD, ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PETITIONER TO FILE OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS; AND GRANTING MOTION TO CHANGE NAME OF RESPONDENT Petitioner, v. FRED FIGUEROA, Warden, 9 Respondent. / United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 Petitioner has filed a request for an extension of time in which to file his opposition to 12 Respondent's Motion to Dismiss. He has also filed a Motion to Change Name of Respondent. 13 Having read and considered Petitioner's requests, and good cause appearing, 14 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner's request for an extension of time is GRANTED. 15 The time in which Petitioner may file his opposition to Respondent's Motion to Dismiss will be 16 extended up to and including twenty-eight (28) days from the date of this Order. 17 18 19 Respondent shall file a reply brief no later than fourteen (14) days after the date Petitioner's opposition is filed. Fred Figueroa, the current warden of the prison where Petitioner is incarcerated, has been 20 substituted as Respondent pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 21 Therefore, Petitioner's Motion to Change Name of Respondent is GRANTED. 22 This Order terminates Docket nos. 13 and 14. 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 DATED: February 12, 2013 YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 25 26 27 28 G:\PRO-SE\YGR\HC.12\Natividad0891.grantEOToppn.wpd

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?