Smith v. Payne et al

Filing 68

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Show Cause Response due by 2/14/2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 01/30/2013. (dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/30/2013) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/30/2013: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (sisS, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 GWENDOLYN SMITH, et al., No. C-12-01732 DMR 9 Plaintiffs, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE v. 11 PAUL PAYNE, et al., 12 13 Defendants. ___________________________________/ 14 Defendants have filed a motion for attorneys’ fees. [Docket No. 58.] Currently, the motion 15 is set for a court hearing on February 28, 2013. According to the local Court rules, Plaintiffs should 16 have filed any brief in opposition to Defendants’ motion by January 23, 2013. See N.D. Cal. Civ. 17 L.R. 7-3. The court has received no such opposition. 18 The court ORDERS Plaintiffs to respond by February 14, 2013 and explain their failure to 19 respond to the motion. In addition, Plaintiffs must simultaneously (1) submit their opposition to the 20 court or (2) file a statement of non-opposition to the motion. This order to show cause does not 21 indicate that the court will necessarily accept Plaintiffs’ late submission. If Plaintiffs’ do not 22 respond by February 14, 2013, Defendants’ motion may be granted. 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. S onna M Judge D NO 28 DONNA M. RYU United States Magistrate Judge Ryu . RT H ER R NIA 27 FO 26 DERED O OR IT IS S LI Dated: January 30, 2013 A 25 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O 24 UNIT ED For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 N D IS T IC T R OF C

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?