Smith v. Payne et al
Filing
68
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Show Cause Response due by 2/14/2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 01/30/2013. (dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/30/2013) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/30/2013: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (sisS, COURT STAFF).
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
GWENDOLYN SMITH, et al.,
No. C-12-01732 DMR
9
Plaintiffs,
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
v.
11
PAUL PAYNE, et al.,
12
13
Defendants.
___________________________________/
14
Defendants have filed a motion for attorneys’ fees. [Docket No. 58.] Currently, the motion
15
is set for a court hearing on February 28, 2013. According to the local Court rules, Plaintiffs should
16
have filed any brief in opposition to Defendants’ motion by January 23, 2013. See N.D. Cal. Civ.
17
L.R. 7-3. The court has received no such opposition.
18
The court ORDERS Plaintiffs to respond by February 14, 2013 and explain their failure to
19
respond to the motion. In addition, Plaintiffs must simultaneously (1) submit their opposition to the
20
court or (2) file a statement of non-opposition to the motion. This order to show cause does not
21
indicate that the court will necessarily accept Plaintiffs’ late submission. If Plaintiffs’ do not
22
respond by February 14, 2013, Defendants’ motion may be granted.
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
S
onna M
Judge D
NO
28
DONNA M. RYU
United States Magistrate Judge Ryu
.
RT
H
ER
R NIA
27
FO
26
DERED
O OR
IT IS S
LI
Dated: January 30, 2013
A
25
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
24
UNIT
ED
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
N
D IS T IC T
R
OF
C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?