Shreeve v. Capital One N.A. et al
ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers denying 5 Motion for TRO (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/22/2012)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
LYMAN SIDNEY SHREEVE, JR.,
Case No.: 12-CV-02293 YGR
ORDER DENYING MOTION OF TIMOTHY
HUBBS FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING
CAPITAL ONE N.A. et al.,
Non-party Timothy Hubbs has filed a Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order (“TRO”) to
Northern District of California
United States District Court
prevent an eviction from taking place. This is a wrongful foreclosure case. Mr. Hubbs, who is not a
party to this action, is a tenant on the property at issue here. The motion states that Defendants have
provided an eviction notice with less than 90 days notice. There is no indication of when the eviction
will take place.
For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Timothy Hubbs’ Motion for a Temporary
Rule 65 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires that actual notice must be given to the
opposing party of the intention to seek a TRO, the date and time for the hearing and the nature of the
relief requested. Unless notice is provided, the moving party must provide a certified showing of
extraordinary circumstances why such notice could not have been given. Reno Air Racing Ass’n, Inc.
v. McCord, 452 F.3d 1126, 1131-32 (9th Cir. 2006). Here, the Court has not been provided with any
declaration showing why such notice could not have been given. Additionally, there is no indication
of when the eviction will take place so as to justify the emergency relief requested. A TRO is a
drastic remedy and accordingly can only be given under proper circumstances.
This Order Terminates Docket Number 5.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Date: May 22, 2012
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?