Ubiquiti Networks, Inc. v. Kozumi USA Corp. et al

Filing 170

PERMANENT INJUNCTION. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 10/10/2013. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/10/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 JENNIFER LEE TAYLOR (CA SBN 161368) JTaylor@mofo.com ALEXEI KLESTOFF (CA SBN 224016) AKlestoff@mofo.com WHITNEY E. MCCOLLUM (CA SBN 253039) WMcCollum@mofo.com MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 425 Market Street San Francisco, California 94105-2482 Telephone: 415.268.7000 Facsimile: 415.268.7522 Attorneys for Plaintiff, UBIQUITI NETWORKS, INC. ROBERT HARKINS (State Bar No.179525) robert.harkins@sedgwicklaw.com JIA-MING SHANG (State Bar No. 233326) jiaming.shang@sedgwicklaw.com SEDGWICK LLP 333 Bush Street, 30th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104-2834 Telephone: 415.781.7900 Facsimile: 415.781.2635 Attorneys for Defendants KOZUMI USA CORP. and SHAO WEI HSU 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 OAKLAND DIVISION 13 14 UBIQUITI NETWORKS, INC., a Delaware corporation, 15 Plaintiff, Case No. 12-CV-2582-CW [PROPOSED] PERMANENT INJUNCTION 16 v. Courtroom: Judge: 17 18 19 20 KOZUMI USA CORP., a Florida corporation; SHAO WEI HSU; DANIEL HSU (AKA HSU SHAO HSIAN); DOES ONE THROUGH ONE HUNDRED, Defendants. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] PERMANENT INJUNCTION CASE NO. 12-CV-2582-CW sf-3310314 2, 4th Floor Hon. Claudia Wilken Complaint filed on May 18, 2012 1 Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, the Court hereby permanently enjoins Defendants 2 Kozumi USA Corp., Shao Wei Hsu (aka William Hsu, William Hsu Wu, Guillermo Hsu), and 3 Daniel Hsu (aka Hsu Shao Hsian) and their agents, officers, directors, servants, employees, 4 owners, representatives, affiliates, and all entities controlled by any of the above persons, and all 5 other persons, firms or corporations in active concert or participation with them from: 6 (1) using or displaying any trademarks, service marks, trade names, trade dress, logos, 7 corporate names and other source identifiers, internet domain names, and uniform resource 8 locaters (“Trademarks”) asserted by Ubiquiti in the Second Amended Complaint; Trademarks 9 owned by Ubiquiti worldwide, including, but not limited to, the Trademarks listed on Exhibit 1 10 hereto; or Trademarks that incorporate, are derived from, or are otherwise confusingly similar to 11 any such Trademarks (collectively, “Ubiquiti Trademarks”); 12 13 (2) manufacturing, selling or providing any goods or services that use or display any Ubiquiti Trademarks without Ubiquiti’s prior written authorization; 14 (3) aiding or abetting others in manufacturing, selling or providing any goods or services 15 that use or display any Ubiquiti Trademarks without Ubiquiti’s prior written authorization; 16 (4) otherwise infringing any of Ubiquiti’s rights in any Ubiquiti Trademarks; 17 (5) registering or attempting to register, or otherwise acquiring or attempting to acquire, 18 any rights with respect to any Ubiquiti Trademarks; 19 (6) using, reproducing or distributing any software that Ubiquiti alleged Defendants to 20 have used and distributed without authorization as forth in the Second Amended Complaint 21 or any other software that incorporates or is derived from all or any portion of such software 22 (“Ubiquiti Software”); 23 (7) manufacturing, selling or providing any goods or services that use or incorporate any 24 Ubiquiti Software without Ubiquiti’s prior written authorization; or 25 // 26 // 27 // 28 // [PROPOSED] PERMANENT INJUNCTION CASE NO. 12-CV-2582-CW sf-3310314 1 1 2 3 (8) otherwise infringing Ubiquiti’s copyrights or other intellectual property rights in any Ubiquiti Software. IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 5 10/10/2013 Dated: ________________ 6 ___________________________ Honorable Claudia Wilken Judge of the United States District Court 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] PERMANENT INJUNCTION CASE NO. 12-CV-2582-CW sf-3310314 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?