Marshall v. Alameda County Sheriff's Department

Filing 6

ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO AMEND. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 12/5/12. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/5/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12

ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT
WITH LEAVE TO AMEND

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. C 12-2849 YGR (PR)

ALEXANDER MARSHALL,

v.
ALAMEDA COUNTY JAIL,

15

Defendant.

16

/

17
18

INTRODUCTION

19
20

This is a federal civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 by a pro se state
prisoner. The Court now reviews the complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a).

21
22
23

DISCUSSION
A.

Standard of Review
A federal court must conduct a preliminary screening in any case in which a prisoner

24

seeks redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity.

25

See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). In its review, the court must identify any cognizable claims and

26

dismiss any claims that are frivolous, malicious, fail to state a claim upon which relief may

27

be granted or seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. See id.

28
No. C 12-2849 YGR (PR)
ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT

1

§ 1915A(b)(1),(2). Pro se pleadings must be liberally construed. See Balistreri v. Pacifica

2

Police Dep’t, 901 F.2d 696, 699 (9th Cir. 1988).
A “complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to ‘state a claim

3

to relief that is plausible on its face.’” Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 1949 (2009)

5

(quoting Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)). “A claim has facial

6

plausibility when the plaintiff pleads factual content that allows the court to draw the

7

reasonable inference that the defendant is liable for the misconduct alleged.” Id. (quoting

8

Twombly, 550 U.S. at 556). Furthermore, a court “is not required to accept legal conclusions

9

cast in the form of factual allegations if those conclusions cannot reasonably be drawn from

10
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

4

the facts alleged.” Clegg v. Cult Awareness Network, 18 F.3d 752, 754–55 (9th Cir. 1994).

11

To state a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, a plaintiff must allege two essential elements:

12

(1) that a right secured by the Constitution or laws of the United States was violated, and

13

(2) that the alleged violation was committed by a person acting under the color of state law.

14

See West v. Atkins, 487 U.S. 42, 48 (1988).

15

B.

Legal Claims

16

In his complaint, plaintiff puts forth various claims of mistreatment at the Santa Rita

17

Jail since 2000. His complaint is not coherent and does not contain sufficient factual matter

18

to state a claim. He must give specific details such as the dates of the alleged violations, the

19

names of persons who committed the alleged violations (naming Alameda County as a

20

defendant is not sufficient), and the acts such persons took on those dates. Accordingly, the

21

complaint is DISMISSED with leave to amend.

22

Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint addressing the deficiencies detailed

23

above within 30 days from the date this order is filed. The first amended complaint must

24

include the caption and civil case number used in this order (12-2849 YGR (PR)) and the

25

words FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT on the first page. Because an amended complaint

26

completely replaces the previous complaints, plaintiff must include in his first amended

27

complaint all the claims he wishes to present and all of the defendants he wishes to sue. See

28
No. C 12-2849 YGR (PR)
ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT

2

1

Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1262 (9th Cir. 1992). Any claims not raised in the

2

amended complaint will be deemed waived. Plaintiff may not incorporate material from the

3

prior complaint by reference. Failure to file an amended complaint in accordance with this

4

order will result in dismissal of this action without further notice to plaintiff.

5

It is plaintiff’s responsibility to prosecute this case. Plaintiff must keep the Court

6

informed of any change of address by filing a separate paper with the clerk headed “Notice

7

of Change of Address.” He must comply with the Court’s orders in a timely fashion or ask

8

for an extension of time to do so. Failure to comply may result in the dismissal of this action

9

pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11

IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED:

December 5, 2012
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

No. C 12-2849 YGR (PR)
ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT

3