Williams v. UAL, Inc. et al

Filing 51

ORDER STRIKING FILING, DOCKET NO.49, ON THE COURT'S OWN MOTION. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 12/13/12. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/13/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ANTHONY L. WILLIAMS Plaintiff, 8 9 ORDER STRIKING FILING, DOCKET NO. 49, ON THE COURT’S OWN MOTION vs. 10 Case No.: 12-CV-3781 YGR UAL, INC., ET AL., United States District Court Northern District of California 11 Defendants. 12 13 Plaintiff Anthony L. Williams (“Plaintiff”) filed “A Notice to All Parties in the Above 14 Entitled Action” on November 21, 2012. (Dkt No. 49, “Notice”.) The Notice purports to stay these 15 16 proceedings “until such time as the Justice Department can order a Case Remand back to State 17 Jurisdiction (28 U.S.C. 2283).” It goes on to state that “[n]o further filings, actions or orders, 18 including filings by any Defendant is permitted EXCEPT an Order of Remand By the District 19 Court.” 20 The Court, on its own motion, STRIKES the Notice as filed improperly and without supporting 21 22 authority. The authority cited by Plaintiff, 28 U.S.C. § 2283, states only that a federal court may not 23 enjoin state court proceedings except under limited circumstances. There is no injunction of state 24 court proceedings at issue here. Moreover, the Court is aware of no legal basis warranting a stay of 25 the order denying Plaintiff’s Motion for Remand. 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: December 13, 2012 _______________________________________ YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?