Crew v. Martel et al

Filing 54

STIPULATION AND ORDER re Briefing 53 Stipulation filed by Mark Christopher Crew. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 7/21/17. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/21/2017)

Download PDF
9 Attorneys for Petitioner MARK CHRISTOPHER CREW ER Gonzale e Yvonne z R o ge r s 7/21/2017 N R NIA S Judg H 8 RT 7 NO 6 EVAN YOUNG, SB # 112201 Attorney at Law 2625 Alcatraz Ave., PMB # 252 Berkeley, CA 94705 Telephone: (510) 910-4811 Facsimile: (510) 652-0443 D IS T IC T R FO 5 LI 4 D RDERE OO IT IS S A 3 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O 2 ANDREW PARNES, SB #83921 Attorney at Law 671 First Avenue North Post Office Box 5988 Ketchum, ID 83340 Telephone: (208) 726-1010 Facsimile: (208) 726-1187 UNIT ED 1 OF C 10 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 ) ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) ) KEVIN CHAPPELL, Warden of ) San Quentin State Prison, ) ) Respondent. ) ) ______________________________________) MARK CHRISTOPHER CREW, 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION RE BRIEFING (DEATH PENALTY CASE) By this Court’s order of February 9, 2016, (Dkt. 48), the parties were directed to 21 22 CASE NO.: CV-12-4259-YGR brief claims designated as record based, and briefing on claims that Petitioner identified as requiring an evidentiary hearing was to be completed after resolution of the record based claims. Four of the claims initially identified in the first category allege cumulative error and prejudice (Claim 20 – cumulative prosecutorial misconduct at penalty phase; Claim 36 – cumulative prosecutorial misconduct at the penalty phase; Claim 43 – trial counsel's cumulative ineffective assistance; Claim 47 – cumulative error of all claims.) Because some of the issues encompassed by these four claims are contained in the group of Stipulation re Briefing 1 1 2 evidentiary hearing claims, the parties propose the following stipulation: Claims 20, 36, 43 and 47 will be removed from the group of claims presently being 3 briefed and decided by the Court and added to the group of claims in which an evidentiary 4 hearing is being sought to be briefed as part of that portion of the case. 5 Dated this 21st day of July, 2017. 6 /s/ ___________________ Evan Young Andrew Parnes Attorneys for Mark Crew 7 8 9 10 I, Evan Young, declare under penalty of perjury that I have obtained the concurrence of Glenn Pruden in the filing of this document. 11 12 13 Executed this 21st day of July, 2017, in Oakland, California. Dated this 21st day of July, 2017. 14 /s/________________________ Glenn Pruden Supervising Deputy Attorney General 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stipulation re Briefing 2 1 2 CERTIFICATE OF ELECTRONIC FILING AND SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that on July 21, the foregoing Stipulation re Record was 3 electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court, and the following person was served 4 electronically, using the CM/ECF system: 5 Glenn Pruden Supervising Deputy Attorney General glenn.pruden@doj.ca.gov 6 7 /s/ Evan Young 8 Evan Young Attorney for Petitioner 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stipulation re Briefing 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?