Crew v. Martel et al
Filing
54
STIPULATION AND ORDER re Briefing 53 Stipulation filed by Mark Christopher Crew. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 7/21/17. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/21/2017)
9
Attorneys for Petitioner
MARK CHRISTOPHER CREW
ER
Gonzale
e Yvonne
z R o ge r s
7/21/2017
N
R NIA
S
Judg
H
8
RT
7
NO
6
EVAN YOUNG, SB # 112201
Attorney at Law
2625 Alcatraz Ave., PMB # 252
Berkeley, CA 94705
Telephone: (510) 910-4811
Facsimile: (510) 652-0443
D IS T IC T
R
FO
5
LI
4
D
RDERE
OO
IT IS S
A
3
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
2
ANDREW PARNES, SB #83921
Attorney at Law
671 First Avenue North
Post Office Box 5988
Ketchum, ID 83340
Telephone: (208) 726-1010
Facsimile: (208) 726-1187
UNIT
ED
1
OF
C
10
11
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
)
)
)
Petitioner,
)
)
v.
)
)
KEVIN CHAPPELL, Warden of
)
San Quentin State Prison,
)
)
Respondent.
)
)
______________________________________)
MARK CHRISTOPHER CREW,
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION RE BRIEFING
(DEATH PENALTY CASE)
By this Court’s order of February 9, 2016, (Dkt. 48), the parties were directed to
21
22
CASE NO.: CV-12-4259-YGR
brief claims designated as record based, and briefing on claims that Petitioner identified as
requiring an evidentiary hearing was to be completed after resolution of the record based
claims.
Four of the claims initially identified in the first category allege cumulative error
and prejudice (Claim 20 – cumulative prosecutorial misconduct at penalty phase; Claim 36
– cumulative prosecutorial misconduct at the penalty phase; Claim 43 – trial counsel's
cumulative ineffective assistance; Claim 47 – cumulative error of all claims.) Because
some of the issues encompassed by these four claims are contained in the group of
Stipulation re Briefing
1
1
2
evidentiary hearing claims, the parties propose the following stipulation:
Claims 20, 36, 43 and 47 will be removed from the group of claims presently being
3
briefed and decided by the Court and added to the group of claims in which an evidentiary
4
hearing is being sought to be briefed as part of that portion of the case.
5
Dated this 21st day of July, 2017.
6
/s/ ___________________
Evan Young
Andrew Parnes
Attorneys for Mark Crew
7
8
9
10
I, Evan Young, declare under penalty of perjury that I have obtained the
concurrence of Glenn Pruden in the filing of this document.
11
12
13
Executed this 21st day of July, 2017, in Oakland, California.
Dated this 21st day of July, 2017.
14
/s/________________________
Glenn Pruden
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Stipulation re Briefing
2
1
2
CERTIFICATE OF ELECTRONIC FILING AND SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on July 21, the foregoing Stipulation re Record was
3
electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court, and the following person was served
4
electronically, using the CM/ECF system:
5
Glenn Pruden
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
glenn.pruden@doj.ca.gov
6
7
/s/ Evan Young
8
Evan Young
Attorney for Petitioner
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Stipulation re Briefing
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?