Young et al v. LG Chem, LTD et al
Filing
62
ORDER SETTING INITIAL CONFERENCE regarding MDL No. 2420 Initial Case Management Conference set for Wednesday, 4/3/2013 02:00 PM in Courtroom 5, 2nd Floor, in US Courthouse, Ronald V. Dellums Federal Building Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 3/4/2013. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibits A and B)(fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/4/2013)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
7
8
9
10
MDL No.: 2420
IN RE:
LITHIUM ION BATTERIES ANTITRUST
LITIGATION
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
ORDER SETTING INITIAL CONFERENCE
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:
ALL CASES
12
13
14
Preamble. The Court wishes to express clearly its expectation that professionalism,
15
courtesy, and civility will endure throughout these proceedings. The Manual for Complex
16
Litigation, Fourth at section 10.21 captures the spirit in these terms:
19
The added demands and burdens of complex litigation place a premium on attorney
professionalism, and the judge should encourage counsel to act responsibly. The
certification requirements of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 11 and 26(g) reflect
some of the attorneys’ obligations as officers of the court.
20
Because of the high level of competence and experience that attorneys ordinarily bring to this type
21
of litigation, the Court is confident that this objective will be achieved without judicial intervention.
17
18
22
The Court HEREBY ORDERS:
23
1.
Initial Conference. All parties shall appear for a conference with the undersigned
24
on April 3, 2013 at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom 5, United States Courthouse, Ronald V. Dellums
25
Federal Building, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, California.
26
a.
Attendance. To minimize costs and facilitate a manageable conference, parties
27
are not required to attend the conference, and parties with similar interests are expected to agree
28
to the extent practicable on a single attorney to act on their joint behalf at the conference. A
1
party will not, by designating an attorney to represent its interests at the conference, be
2
precluded from other representation during the litigation; and attendance at the conference will
3
not waive objections to jurisdiction, venue, or service.
b.
4
Other Participants. Persons who are not named as parties in this litigation but
5
may later be joined as parties or are parties in related litigation pending in other federal and
6
state courts are invited to attend in person or by counsel.
7
2.
Purposes and Agenda. The conference will be held for the purposes specified in
Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(a), 16(b), 16(c), and 26(f) and subject to the sanctions prescribed in Rule 16(f).
9
More particularly, for this initial conference, a tentative agenda is appended as Attachment A. The
10
Court anticipates additional conferences will be required to address additional issues such as those
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
8
appended as Attachment B. However, the Court will entertain counsel’s requests to address other
12
items not specifically on Attachment A. Any such requests must be filed by March 28, 2013.
13
14
3.
Preparations for Conference.
a.
Procedures for Complex Litigation. Counsel are expected to familiarize
15
themselves with the Manual for Complex Litigation, Fourth and be prepared at the conference
16
to suggest procedures that will facilitate the just, speedy, and inexpensive resolution of this
17
litigation.
18
b.
Initial Conference of Counsel. Before the conference, counsel shall confer and
19
seek consensus to the extent possible with respect to the items on the agenda, including a
20
proposed discovery plan under Rule 26(f) and a suggested schedule under Rule 16(b) for
21
joinder of parties, amendment of pleadings, consideration of any class action allegations,
22
motions, and trial.
23
c.
Joint Preliminary Statement. Counsel shall submit to the Court by March 28,
24
2013, a preliminary statement. The parties shall be limited to one such submission for each of
25
the following three groups: (i) all direct purchaser plaintiffs, (ii) all indirect purchaser plaintiffs,
26
and (iii) defendants. The statement shall include:
27
28
i. Each group’s preliminary understanding of the facts involved in the
litigation and the critical factual and legal issues;
2
1
ii. A list of all pending motions;
2
iii. A list of all related cases pending in state or federal court and their
current status, to the extent known; and
3
iv. A proposed schedule.
4
d.
5
List of Affiliated Companies and Counsel. To assist the Court in identifying any
6
problems of recusal or disqualification, counsel will submit to the Court by March 28, 2013, a
7
list of all companies affiliated with the parties and all counsel associated in the litigation.
8
9
4.
Interim Measures. Until otherwise ordered by the court:
a.
Admission of Counsel. Attorneys admitted to practice and in good standing in
any United States District Court are admitted pro hac vice in this litigation. Association of
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
10
local co-counsel is not required.
12
13
14
b.
Pleadings. Each defendant is granted an extension of time for responding by
motion or answer to the complaint(s) until a date to be set at the initial conference.
c.
Pending and New Discovery. Pending the conference, all outstanding disclosure
15
and discovery proceedings are stayed and no further discovery shall be initiated. This order
16
does not (1) preclude voluntary informal discovery regarding the identification and location of
17
relevant documents and witnesses; (2) preclude parties from stipulating to the conduct of a
18
deposition that has already been scheduled; (3) prevent a party from voluntarily making
19
disclosures, responding to an outstanding discovery request under Federal Rule of Civil
20
Procedure 33, 34, or 36; or (4) authorize a party to suspend its efforts in gathering information
21
needed to respond to a request under Rule 33, 34, or 36. Relief from this stay may be granted
22
for good cause shown, such as the ill health of a proposed deponent.
23
d.
Preservation of Records. All parties and their counsel are reminded of their duty
24
to preserve evidence that may be relevant to this action. The duty extends to documents, data,
25
and tangible things in the possession, custody and control of the parties to this action, and any
26
employees, agents, contractors, carriers, bailees, or other nonparties who possess materials
27
reasonably anticipated to be subject to discovery in this action. “Documents, data, and tangible
28
things” shall be interpreted broadly to include writings, records, files, correspondence, reports,
3
1
memoranda, calendars, diaries, minutes, electronic messages, voice mail, E-mail, telephone
2
message records or logs, computer and network activity logs, hard drives, backup data,
3
removable computer storage media such as tapes, discs and cards, printouts, document image
4
files, Web pages, databases, spreadsheets, software, books, ledgers, journals, orders, invoices,
5
bills, vouchers, checks statements, worksheets, summaries, compilations, computations, charts,
6
diagrams, graphic presentations, drawings, films, charts, digital or chemical process
7
photographs, video, phonographic, tape or digital recordings or transcripts thereof, drafts,
8
jottings and notes, studies or drafts of studies or other similar such material. Information that
9
serves to identify, locate, or link such material, such as file inventories, file folders, indices, and
metadata, is also included in this definition. Until the parties reach an agreement on a
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
10
preservation plan or the Court orders otherwise, each party shall take reasonable steps to
12
preserve all documents, data and tangible things containing information potentially relevant to
13
the subject matter of this litigation. Counsel is under an obligation to the Court to exercise all
14
reasonable efforts to identify and notify parties and non-parties, including employees of
15
corporate or institutional parties.
e.
16
Motions. No motion shall be filed under Rule 11, 12, or 56 without leave of court
17
and unless it includes a certificate that the movant has conferred with opposing counsel in a
18
good-faith effort to resolve the matter without court action.
f.
19
20
21
22
23
24
Orders of Transferor Courts. All orders by transferor courts imposing dates for
pleading or discovery are vacated.
5.
Later Filed Cases. This order shall also apply to related cases later filed in,
removed to, or transferred to this Court.
6.
Lead and Liaison Counsel Appointments.
a.
Liaison Counsel. Prior to the initial conference, and to the extent they have not
25
already done so, counsel shall confer and seek consensus on the selection of a candidate for the
26
position of liaison counsel who will be charged with essentially administrative matters. The
27
parties shall provide a proposed order regarding appointment of same. Appointment of liaison
28
counsel shall be subject to the approval of the Court. If parties cannot among themselves agree
4
1
to the appointment of the liaison counsel, the Court will address the matter at the initial
2
conference. At the first conference liaison counsel and/or the parties should be prepared to
3
discuss any additional needs for an organizational structure or any additional matters consistent
4
with the efficient handling of this matter.
5
b.
Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee. The Court intends to appoint a Plaintiffs’
6
Steering Committee (“PSC”) to conduct and coordinate the discovery stage of this litigation
7
with the defendants’ representatives or committee. Prior to the initial conference, counsel for
8
the plaintiffs, to the extent they have not already done so, shall confer and seek consensus on
9
membership on the PSC and parties shall provide a proposed order regarding appointment of
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
same. Appointment to the PSC shall be subject to the approval of the Court.
The main criteria for membership in the PSC will be: (a) willingness and
12
availability to commit to a time-consuming project; (b) ability to work cooperatively with
13
others; and (c) professional experience in this type of litigation. Applications/nominations
14
should succinctly address each of the above criteria as well as any other relevant matters. The
15
Court will only consider attorneys who have filed a civil action in this litigation. If parties
16
cannot among themselves agree to the membership of the PSC, the Court will address the
17
matter at the initial conference. At the initial conference PSC and/or the parties should be
18
prepared to discuss any additional needs for an organizational structure or any additional
19
matters consistent with the efficient handling of this matter.
20
IT IS SO ORDERED.
21
22
23
Date: March 4, 2013
_______________________________________
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
24
25
26
27
28
5
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?