Om et al v. Melero et al
ORDER DISMISSING CASE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 4/16/2013. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/16/2013)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
KAMAJI OM, KRSNAYA OM, and SUKLA
No. C 12-5498 CW
CASE FOR FAILURE
OFFICER MELERO, et al.,
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
On February 27, 2013, the Court issued an order dismissing
Plaintiffs’ claims against City Defendants with prejudice.
to amend their claims against Defendant Vickie Virk and to “show
good cause why their claims against Virk should not be dismissed
for failure to complete timely service as required by Federal Rule
of Civil Procedure 4(m).”
Plaintiffs that “failure to comply with the instructions in this
order may result in the dismissal of this action for failure to
In that order, the Court gave Plaintiffs twenty-one days
Id. at 10.
The Court also warned
Id. at 10-11.
Because Plaintiffs have failed to file an amended complaint
and have not shown good cause why their claims against Virk should
survive, the Court hereby DISMISSES their claims against Virk with
The clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and close
IT IS SO ORDERED.
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?